Forum Replies Created

Page 86 of 195
  • Robin S. kurz

    January 4, 2016 at 10:21 am in reply to: audio stopped working on copy of project

    I would try deleting all generated files, i.e. render and cache files, which it sounds like may have become corrupted. Can happen. Though you’ll have to dive into the library itself to rid yourself of the cache files (which are then of course regenerated), since, even though they also live in the “Render files” folder, they’re not covered by the menu command. I would do that after quitting FCP first though.

    – RK

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

  • Robin S. kurz

    January 4, 2016 at 10:11 am in reply to: Precision Editor

    So I guess that means no quote? Just a jump on the ol’ evasion bandwagon. Gotcha. Disingenuously trying to turn the tables (i.e. believing to) seems to be a rather common practice. Shame, yes.

    But I’m glad you could at least garner some calls from the back corner of the room to feel exculpated. 😀

    [Steve Connor] “Time to hit the imaginary “ignore” button?”

    Yes. Please. Thanks.

  • Robin S. kurz

    January 4, 2016 at 1:58 am in reply to: Precision Editor

    https://forums.creativecow.net/readpost/335/86485

    Don’t know what to give you beyond that. Here they “stick” every time.

    – RK

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

  • Robin S. kurz

    January 4, 2016 at 1:23 am in reply to: Precision Editor

    [Steve Connor] “It’s lovely that you don’t get ANY performance hits”

    Feel free to quote the part where I said anything even close to not having “ANY performance hits”.

    And… “Are you incapable of engaging in a civil discussion? Why is it that your attitude is always confrontational?”

    – RK

  • Robin S. kurz

    January 4, 2016 at 12:55 am in reply to: Precision Editor

    And then there’s always the Command editor…

    – RK

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

  • Robin S. kurz

    January 4, 2016 at 12:48 am in reply to: Precision Editor

    [Craig Alan] “Not exactly. They need to be expanded first AFAIK.”

    I’m not sure if you’re not reading (and trying) what I’ve written, or if I’m completely misunderstanding what it is you’re looking for.

    Once again: ⇧] or [ EXPANDS the clip and selects the respective AUDIO edit point. Move skimmer. Hit ⇧X. Done.

    – RK

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

  • Robin S. kurz

    January 4, 2016 at 12:43 am in reply to: Precision Editor

    Why are you able to quote, but not answer (one of many) simple questions?

    – RK

  • Robin S. kurz

    January 4, 2016 at 12:08 am in reply to: Precision Editor

    [Oliver Peters] “You are missing the point that Apple has chosen to restrict the functions among the various timeline views and that affects how you edit when trying to do split edits.”

    I’m sorry… among various timeline views?? So now you can’t expand the audio in various timeline views?

    Actually, I got it the first time around. I guess I was just trying to give you that last little benefit of the doubt.

    Sorry if I can’t get myself to consider functionality not being available in one of six (mind you, not two, not three, no… SIX) possible options as some sort of “restriction” worth wasting this kind of time on. Wow.

    Especially in light of the fact—for the third time—that you can have the best of both your worlds with near zero effort as I described above, and you once again chose to avoid pointing to how that is not a solution to the “problem”. I won’t bother speculating as to why, nor do I actually even care anymore at this point.

    Certainly none of the aforementioned doubt remains. Cheers.

  • Robin S. kurz

    January 3, 2016 at 10:51 pm in reply to: Precision Editor

    [Craig Alan] “I’m not a skilled touch type editor. Though I do like keyboard commands over mousing. “

    The one kind of requires the other, no?? 😀

    [Craig Alan] “… but 2 up is not displayed.”

    Yet another something I personally have never missed or used (neither in X nor legacy). Especially when editing audio, I’m not exactly sure what the point would be either. So I’m probably the wrong person to ask.

    [Craig Alan] “Create a split edit by expanding audio/video”

    There is no need to explicitly expand the clip first. Simply hitting the aforementioned shortcut(s) will do that for you.

    [Craig Alan] “So what I find myself doing is playing the video, setting a marker where i want the split edit to be and then expanding both clip’s audio/video and then using the mouse and trim tool to roll edit the audio to the marker.”

    Clearly something you will not need to do ever again.

    [Craig Alan] “Or I can skim to the point where I want the split edit and shift x “

    Bingo. ⇧+] or [ and ⇧X. Done.

    [Craig Alan] “It really should be a simple command, no? Select two adjacent clips, audio could be expanded or not. With the skimmer or playhead where you want the split edit to be, press a command for a split edit. Done.”

    Exactly.

    – RK

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

  • Robin S. kurz

    January 3, 2016 at 10:42 pm in reply to: Precision Editor

    [Oliver Peters] “because it’s not really an accurate frame-by-frame representation.”

    Erm… no. Of course not. [insert pejorative “duh!” here] I would have thought that’s pretty much a given. I was never talking about nor did I mean frame accurate. It’s just about simply IDENTIFYING any given clip in my project at a glance, as I already wrote.

    Unless of course you memorize what “MVI0385xyz” in any given project contains without any reference (chicklet) whatsoever. Because I don’t know how you do it, but if I’m looking for a specific spot, let alone clip, I can identify it immediately—as in the timeframe of milliseconds—by its filmstrip. If you want to scroll, skim, scrub around aimlessly instead until you find what you’re looking for (the only alternative I can think of and personally am left with, if working in that mode), great. Anything but efficient in my book i.e. in the context of my workflow, which is why there is no logical reason for me to use it. And since, as I pointed out, using filmstrips (of whatever size) has no relevant effect on the performance, I don’t see what possible disadvantage as opposed to advantage it could otherwise have. But I’m assuming you can enlighten me? 🙂

    [Oliver Peters] “… it doesn’t seem necessary for a lot of folks. But that’s all a matter of choice.”

    I believe that was my conclusion also, yes.

    [Oliver Peters] “The issue is that Apple has chosen to restrict certain functions of the timeline in that view for no reason that’s been explained.”

    Aha. So there’s also some sort of major, unacceptable disadvantage to doing it as I described and demonstrated above, that I’m also unable to recognize?? I’m quite curious. Because sorry, but if someone’s machine can’t work without some major performance hit in THAT setting either (from what I gather your only argument against using anything other option than “chicklet”?), then I’d say FCP or what horrible restrictions Apple has put on FCP’s options, are the very least of their worries. Seriously. In which case, yes, I guess FCP X clearly isn’t their best choice either. Oh well.

    – RK

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

Page 86 of 195

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy