Forum Replies Created

Page 2 of 2
  • Robert Smith

    November 17, 2013 at 7:06 pm in reply to: Nothing in my manual

    heh – why couldn’t i have said it nicely …like you did 😉

  • Robert Smith

    November 17, 2013 at 7:00 pm in reply to: Nothing in my manual

    Thanks Bill
    The fact is a 72 dpi raster satisfies my clients kerning requirements and most traditional typesetters tools (excepting Elrod strip) have been available in their video counterparts since the Aston I learned on in the early 1980’s.

    The suggestion to separate letters into individual elements would cause clumsy timelines missed deadlines and mistakes plus Andy Branner has painstakingly pointed out, several methods to access the comprehensive typesetting tools that are currently baked into FCPX .

    In my bumptious opinion, those methods cannot be used in a professional environment as one does not look away from the typography when preparing text during a client attended session.
    Routine keyboard actions for basic tasks are deeply ingrained and do not change lightly, we know what needs to happen when pressing a key – just need the active application to get on and do it.

  • Robert Smith

    November 17, 2013 at 4:48 pm in reply to: Nothing in my manual

    Um… thanks; you have taken the trouble to kindly detail nearly all of the methods I came across whilst looking for the standard method.

  • Robert Smith

    March 22, 2013 at 10:44 am in reply to: Please Inform an FCP luddite 🙂

    Thanks Mr Kolb , for understanding my issue and for taking the trouble to reply.

Page 2 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy