Forum Replies Created

  • Randy Little

    November 7, 2014 at 1:50 am in reply to: Premiere Pro CC to Resolve workflow

    HA it doesn’t. And the Timecode BS that Premier makes in an XML and EDL is ridiculous.

  • Randy Little

    September 26, 2013 at 2:55 am in reply to: HP Dreamcolor vs Flanders Scientific

    Well we take a Flanders lm 2461w on set and we are not millionaires. So a dream color at half the price would be a great option if you don’t care if its calibrated right.

  • Randy Little

    March 14, 2011 at 12:52 am in reply to: Will Resolve work on the New Macbook Pro?

    cuda is part of openCL all of cuda. So its a matter of Resolve supporting OPEN CL. I believe it more a matter of ATI drivers not really supporting open CL very well even though they where a big part of the design.

  • Randy Little

    November 11, 2010 at 8:55 pm in reply to: MC Color support

    AJA Support for Resolve? Um Never? Seeing as its owned by black Magic.

  • Randy Little

    January 3, 2010 at 4:22 am in reply to: Motion 4 for Compositing

    Motion might be ok for small comps but its not a hard core comp package even with conduit. Motion also lacks A LOT of the higher end tools you are going to need like real keyers. The keyers in Motion are horrible and it doesn’t easily allow for doing channel op type keys. So unless you think a Key is just dropping in a single keyer motion isn’t going to do the job. Its hard to do compound channels and such in motion that are still hard in AE but at least it does them. If you are going to be doing real commercial or film comping you really should look at Fusion or Nuke. Also there are some pretty basic tools missing from motion like either a spline or grid warper. fusion and Nuke will allow you to read in real 3d geo and cameras for doing projections on to actually 3d geo. Motion is fine for basic animation and basic comping but its no high end tool and its can’t even do some basic things shake can do. It just depends on if you are really comping or just layering files.

  • Randy Little

    December 3, 2009 at 9:10 am in reply to: morpher warper tools

    I need quality like a real morpher with full spline control that doesn’t take years. Sorry but Frame blending stills is a far cry from real morphing.

    Like this is all done with a re:flex. No squishy pixels.
    https://revisionfx.com/view_media.php?m=/video/products/reflex/gallery/WSJ.mov&t=mov&s=320,240
    https://revisionfx.com/view_media.php?m=/video/products/reflex/gallery/CrystalLightSmall.mov&t=mov&s=320,180

    all of which can be done with either Re:flex or with the tools built into Shake and Nuke. Re:flex doesn’t seem to work in motion so I thought I would ask if there was something as good as reflex.

  • Randy Little

    December 3, 2009 at 5:31 am in reply to: Should I be using Motion for a time-lapse morph edit?

    This is at worst (unless just shot horrible) a day or 2 of work. You need RE:FLEX or other morpher (shake Nuke what ever that has a morpher) I can do one for you if you want to send me once transition. This is simple simple stuff if just you have to know how to do it. Once you see it done you will go OH THAT’S IT?

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy