Forum Replies Created

Page 38 of 54
  • The latest versions of our plugins are already Intel Mac ready.

    Glad we could answer your request so quickly! :-). Seriously, we need to put this information on our website so that it is more obvious.

    And thanks for the congrats!

    Pete

  • The latest versions of our plugins are already Intel Mac ready.

    Glad we could answer your request so quickly! :-). Seriously, we need to put this information on our website so that it is more obvious.

    And thanks for the congrats!

    Pete

  • Actually Michael Jackson’s video was done with in-house software at PDI (Pacific Data Images), now part of Dreamworks Animation. Software written by Shawn Neely and Thad Beier, to the best of my recollection. ( paper on the method used at Thad Beier’s site: https://www.hammerhead.com/thad/morph.html )

    And there is a demo of RE:Flex available at our website: https://www.revisionfx.com/products/reflex/ Go to the Downloads subsection for the installer.

    Pete Litwinowicz
    https://www.revisionfx.com

  • Peter Litwinowicz

    March 19, 2007 at 6:49 pm in reply to: Twixtor and FCP 5.1.4 – Help!!

    This is an FCP bug that is easily fixed.

    This is related to FCP

  • Peter Litwinowicz

    March 19, 2007 at 6:49 pm in reply to: Twixtor and FCP 5.1.4 – Help!!

    This is an FCP bug that is easily fixed.

    This is related to FCP

  • Peter Litwinowicz

    March 12, 2007 at 12:46 am in reply to: Fieldskit Deinterlacer: 2 questions

    The detect motion setting is ignored when the Fill Method is None.

    The reason that Smooth and Sharpen is not ignored is that you just might want to have the deinterlacing be similar across all frames, even when you aren’t deinterlacing with our interpolation methods.

    Pete

  • Peter Litwinowicz

    March 12, 2007 at 12:46 am in reply to: Fieldskit Deinterlacer: 2 questions

    The detect motion setting is ignored when the Fill Method is None.

    The reason that Smooth and Sharpen is not ignored is that you just might want to have the deinterlacing be similar across all frames, even when you aren’t deinterlacing with our interpolation methods.

    Pete

  • Peter Litwinowicz

    March 11, 2007 at 8:02 pm in reply to: Fieldskit Deinterlacer: 2 questions

    Also,I gave you instructions to key if you didn’t need 30p (25p) out at the end. I was giving you instructions in case you need to have interlaced footage at the end and need each field deinterlaced.

    if you need deinterlaced footage at the end then drop the footage into a 30 (25) fps comp and use one of deinterlacing settings of FieldsKit to give 1 frame per frame. You can key before or after the application of FieldsKit, whichever gives you better results.

    pete

  • Peter Litwinowicz

    March 11, 2007 at 8:02 pm in reply to: Fieldskit Deinterlacer: 2 questions

    Also,I gave you instructions to key if you didn’t need 30p (25p) out at the end. I was giving you instructions in case you need to have interlaced footage at the end and need each field deinterlaced.

    if you need deinterlaced footage at the end then drop the footage into a 30 (25) fps comp and use one of deinterlacing settings of FieldsKit to give 1 frame per frame. You can key before or after the application of FieldsKit, whichever gives you better results.

    pete

  • Peter Litwinowicz

    March 11, 2007 at 8:00 pm in reply to: Fieldskit Deinterlacer: 2 questions

    Now breathe. You definitely have options.

    First: FieldsKit works with either setting of “NONE” or the appropriate field-separation set in AE’s interpret footage. Our older versions required you to set the interpret footage to NON.

    You can do what Pierre suggested, but you can also do the following: set the footage to it’s appropriate field-ness in AE’s interpret footage. Drop the footage into a 59.94 (or 50) fps comp. That way you can see all fields, deinterlaced. Then you can key and then apply FieldsKit (making sure to use the =1 Frame per Field, 2x FPS setting), or you can apply FieldsKit first and then key. Whichever works for you and gives you better results.

    Pete
    https://www.revisionfx.com

Page 38 of 54

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy