Pedro Luz
Forum Replies Created
-
Hi,
Many thanks again for your feedback.
I will stop asking questions.
I don’t have any doubt that you are able to install the network that I need, but at this point I’m just run out of budget to be able to pay for it.
Again, many thanks for all your insights and information regarding this kind of networks and qnap in particular in this and other forums in the internet.
I learned a lot from it, to buy what I really need.
Thanks
pedro
-
Hi Bob,
Many thanks, to the usual suspect!
Over time I have learn a lot from your feedback in this and other places, until I decided to move into this direction.
Forgot to say all my machines are PC”S with the a qnap 10GBE cards aquantia chip.
The qnap is linked to the router using the two qnap 10gbe ports, allowing 20GBe connection to the router, and I can only have 10gbe connection to each client (I learned that from you).
Regarding the M2 SDD (4TB each SSD, in disk array 1 (security and redundancy I suppose)).
a) It’s the first time I hear that the main purpose of these m2 SSD is to store the OS, if I can ask, it’s much safer and faster, but if I can ask how fast is in comparing this to have the OS in the thin disk array 6?
I saw some videos, even in the qnap site with a tvs thunderbolt 8 bays HDD with two m2 SSD, and they were recomending to use it as a cache.
b) I’m asking about the difference between performance between disk array 6 and 50, because the local people are insisting I should use disk array 50 (they say is faster)
c) Assuming that at later date I will populate the four sata SSD, what I should do with them?
c1. expand the thin disk array 6 to incorporate the SSD to it?
c2. Create a new pool and use it as a disk cache? (R, W, RW ?)
d) finally and out of curiosity, this unit supports the 40gbe cards, if at later install a 40gbe card on the qnap, get a 40gbe router and 40gbe NIC on the clients, what I should or shouldn’t expect in terms of network performance?
again many thanks
pedro
-
Thanks Chris,
I did tried to use thumbnails, but in a a large image a single line or half line of bad pixels, can’t be seen in the thunumbails.
By some reason the thumbnails will render in file explorer (win10 pro, but in ae the render fails.
When I say a price point, render garden costs 99US, and is able to speed up your ae render times by 100% (it’s like having two computers with the same specifications running inside a single machine).
Ramma is costing 72US, just for scanning a dir and report bad files.
Anyway, just asking what it’s the soft app that people are using to get the bad files,
I just want it to scan a dir and report the bad files in a text format, so I can locate them in, delete them, and restart the render.
I don’t need to know why they are bad, they are bad, ae can import them, but it can’t render them. I don’t need any fancy gui, showing the files, and their location and the reason they are bad.
Just to recap,
1. rama (seems the professional choice, it seems (85 euros)
2. pyton script
https://github.com/ftarlao/check-media-integrity
3. Image sequence scanner (free but beta)
https://sourceforge.net/projects/imgseqscan/
Any other input, thanks
pedro
-
In the process of trying to find any soft that can do this I came across the image sequence scanner, it’s free but it’s in beta
https://sourceforge.net/projects/imgseqscan/
There should be some program out there that can do this, due to the installed base of ae and animation users.
-
Thanks Roei,
Ramma is what I’m looking for, the only thing;
it’s quite expensive (85 euros) for what it does.
Any other tool that can do this?
this is the correct link for ramma, since in the letterbanks link is wrong.
pedro
-
Thanks Filip,
Nope, I’m not familiar with pyton, I’m looking for a simple gui app, that can scan a dir and gives me a list of bad files.
There are countless jpg/file repair app’s outhere, I don’t want want to repair them, I just want to know, which files are corrupted.
thx
pedro