Forum Replies Created

Page 6 of 428
  • Seems to me you might be better off just linking to the 60fps material in your 24fps timeline to start and making the edits that way. Or at least something to try in a quick test. Make the slow down either on the timeline with the motion effect editor, or via the source settings to payback frame for frame to match project rate.

    Michael

  • Did you add the MXF files from the Avid/MediaFiles folder structure to the Media Pool in DaVinci?

    Michael

  • Michael Phillips

    March 21, 2020 at 2:52 pm in reply to: DNxHD codecs on MAC OS

    Not so much the DNxHD codec which AME does support, it’s the wrapper and OSX changes to MOV, etc. as you mention as the end of the post. Wrapping it as MXF is the solution.

    Michael

  • Michael Phillips

    March 19, 2020 at 5:02 pm in reply to: Avid MC 2020.2 BETA

    2018.x.x series is the older UI
    2019.x.x. is the newer UI
    2020.x.x. is the newer UI for Catalina. There will never be the older UI on Catalina

    As far as horror stories, I have not hear anything of horror – there are some issues being raised with some of the title related stuff, etc. I don’t know if Avid has a dedicated public 2020 beta feedback setup for its public beta.

    Michael

  • Michael Phillips

    March 3, 2020 at 2:11 pm in reply to: Live Video Capture | Avid Media Composer

    You can get IO devices that have both HDMI and SDI – it will be dependent on what the camera itself has a connection for output. And unlike some dedicated external recorders, MC does not support any embedded file naming or camera START/STOP commands. It will all be manual. And if capturing directly, original camera filename may not be needed, but you sure do need a quick backup solution when doing so.

    HDMI allows for bandwidth than SDI depending on the version of HDMI being used. HDMI 2.0, for example, has 3x the bandwidth of SDI. Depending on the format, SDI will eventually need dual or quad connections.

    Michael

  • Michael Phillips

    February 25, 2020 at 10:50 pm in reply to: Panasonic LUMIX DMC-LX100 Footage

    Timecode is the way to go if you can manage it! If using this camera, you would need the one LTC device recording to the camera after having been synced to the TC output of the TASCAM.

    Michael

  • Michael Phillips

    February 25, 2020 at 7:39 pm in reply to: Panasonic LUMIX DMC-LX100 Footage

    If audio waveform sync works for you, the camera makes beautiful images – so no real rush to change cameras if I were you. I was just giving you a heads up as to how to sync your double system audio workflow as I’m assuming your audio files do not have TOD either. In order to do timecode sync, both devices need to be able to jam to a timecode source or you are recording LTC to each of the device’s audio track as sync reference using something like Tentacle Systems.

    Michael

  • Michael Phillips

    February 25, 2020 at 1:16 pm in reply to: Panasonic LUMIX DMC-LX100 Footage

    Seeing as there was no time of day timecode used, you will most likely be using AutoSync with Waveform. You can’t select all your day’s dailies and do that, you will need to select each pair of V+A files, then AutoSync with Waveform. You should be fine.

    Michael

  • Michael Phillips

    February 23, 2020 at 3:49 am in reply to: Tape Name| Reel Name | Red Cine X Pro

    If it did, it wouldn’t matter with Media Composer as it does not support embedded REEL in MOV files.

    Michael

  • Michael Phillips

    February 22, 2020 at 5:57 pm in reply to: Speeding up high speed ftg to match sound

    If your on set recording was 60.000fps, and the slowdown to 23.976 was frame for frame, then you would need to apply a 250.25% timewarp to return clips to original recorded speed and not have drift.

    Michael

Page 6 of 428

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy