Mark Smith
Forum Replies Created
-
I Have used BBEdit to edit Panasonic metadata in the past to resurrect some problematic clips. I’ll take a swing at the method you offer in your conjecture and see what happens. Its a bit more in the weeds than I really want to be , but if it saves a little time by helping port those time lines over to FCP it might be worth the effort.
-
Here’s what I get when I try to import xml from resolve. I don’t care if I get the resolve organization, I just wan the time lines to come into FCP.
-
Mark Smith
December 1, 2022 at 2:46 am in reply to: Almost sync sound With Tentacle track E recorderIn resolve- fairlight – I count 7 subframes offset with the TrackE ahead of the camera audio . Timecode is the same .
-
Mark Smith
November 30, 2022 at 10:33 pm in reply to: Almost sync sound With Tentacle track E recorderRecording on a BMPC6K pro and Track E . 6K Pro is 48K sample, Track E is 48 K sample though 32 bit float vs 24 bit for 6K so the sample mismatch is not sampling rate just bits. I haven’t tried Track E at 24 bit, which could be an open avenue.
-
Mark Smith
November 29, 2022 at 12:14 am in reply to: Interesting comparison of FCP vs Resolve 18.1 Voice Isolation by Michael SchmidtResolve 18.1.1 – I think Voice iso now works on 32 bit float Track E files. Just noticed this today.
-
Mark Smith
November 23, 2022 at 10:54 pm in reply to: Third Party direct BRAW supporting coming to FCPGO !GO ! GO ! I don’t code, but I could send some coffee if that helps. I’m creeping into resolve because of a project with tons of Braw . Both the director and I would rather be in X. Nothing against resolve other than any app with a 4000 page pdf for a manual needs to slow its roll a fair amount. Resolve is a fine editor, I prefer X, many times over. Resolve has too damn many mouse clicks.
-
Mark Smith
November 23, 2022 at 2:25 am in reply to: Interesting comparison of FCP vs Resolve 18.1 Voice Isolation by Michael SchmidtResolve supports 32 bit float, but voice iso apparently does not.
-
Mark Smith
November 23, 2022 at 2:24 am in reply to: Interesting comparison of FCP vs Resolve 18.1 Voice Isolation by Michael SchmidtI like the Track E’s . I use them with either Sanken COS -11 or countryman B6 mics in 32 bit float recording and they have been great. There is a leap of faith one takes with these because you can’t monitor them as you would a radio mic, but after a year + of field use in some pretty tough situations, I have no complaints. Obviously the limitation of not being able to monitor the subject from a distance is a limiting factor. That said I trust them completely and with some good mic mounting technique – props to bubble bee mic mounts – I have had no situations where I had sound problems using these recorders other than when a subject is gesturing and taps the point where the mic is placed. A radio mic would have suffered the same consequences in that case.
-
Mark Smith
November 22, 2022 at 7:09 pm in reply to: Interesting comparison of FCP vs Resolve 18.1 Voice Isolation by Michael SchmidtOne possible difference between FCPX voice iso and Resolve Voice iso is that Resolve does not work on 32 bit float files and X does…. I’ve been using Track E recorders for a year or more now and have had to voice iso in a number of situations and X handles those tracks and Resolve did not voice iso a 32 bit track when I tried it yesterday.
-
Mark Smith
November 8, 2022 at 2:21 am in reply to: Third Party direct BRAW supporting coming to FCPI’ve been working in resolve as a work around with a project that has a lot of Braw content. I would be much happier working in X with support for Braw as described above. Resolve is great for Grading, ok as an edit platform ( there are pluses and minuses) . Maybe I am not a real editor, whatever, I think X suits me far better for editing. Resolve Cut page which is supposed to sorta kinda be like X doesn’t even allow. J-L cuts?