Margus Voll
Forum Replies Created
-
-
I see the same thing here on tv. Some editors edit. Use preseted plugins and it all goes sideways.
Finally it gets aired. Horrible.—
Margus
-
I think the beauty is that you can have Resolve on mac what makes it more affordable
to most people. It needs to have qualified mac and gpu and you are there if one will summarize a lot.
Still playing out, rendering etc. in real time.Rendering speed counts when you have lets say 3 minutes HD or feature.
It will take so much more time to render cache with different gradings.
Generally if you get more time to do your job you can make it more complex in
the same time and get better results. I have seen it on some other rendering.
It may seem to you as 90 second but count it in one year and there you can
get substantial number in saved time.And yes convenience.
One reason i swapped to the mac. All jobs were so much easy to complete.
Now i have the same feeling with Resolve.
Some things that i really need in my studio: quality, speed, convenience.—
Margus
-
-
For me some apple stuff is still work in progress like color bugs or soundtrack pro which hangs like …..
I still use them as i want to have my results or they fit my pipeline etc.
So this matureness thing seems to me a bit showing of with lack of knowledge.
In the end what matters is how well and fast you can finish a job and bill your client. Does not matter really if product “feels” this or that. We are not in the feeling business here.
—
Margus
-
Here is nice video where Dan shows some aspects of Resolve in action.
There you can see what it means to work FAST.https://www.macvideo.tv/editing/features/index.cfm?articleId=3248808
One video is worth more than thousand words.
—
Margus
-
-
I do not have 285 so for me it is really sensible option.
More power gives more nodes. It really depends on complexity and type of work you do.
—
Margus
-
-