Hi everybody and thanks for your replays so far.
I know there are no two similar workflows. The guys from CatDV showed me that on the IBC in Amsterdam. CatDV offers many ways to organize the workflow, and that irritates me :)) Even now, when I am writing this message, I have some new ideas how I could manage it.
90 % of the material we edit is new material, and only 10 % comes from archive. To change this ratio, we want to develop an archive. That is why we want to use CatDV. On the one hand CatDv could help us to organize our workflows and to improve them. On the other hand it could help us to develop the archive.
It is very interesting to read about your experiences and your workflows. For instance, I never thought before of such thing as using CATdv and FCP simultaneously.
It would be nice if you continue to share your experience.
Best Regards from Berlin
Leonid