Lance Moody
Forum Replies Created
-
Is the 1866MHz DDR3 RAM the same stuff you can get anywhere now? If so, it looks to be very cheap (compared to what I put into my machine in late 2010).
-
An earlier poster mentioned CPU specifically as he struggled to think of a non issue, ANY non-issue to complain about. Hilariously, he first tendered the idea that the machine was “too small”!
The CPU has never been upgradable on the pro machines officially.
-
“No Lance – I mean compared to “real” workstations on any platform, where you can easily replace anything which needs replacement. What’s fascinating is your lightning attack on anything that doesn’t smack of fan-ism.”
And which components have you confirmed can not be replaced?
-
Actually the ridiculous quote mentions CPU. You don’t yet know that you cant upgrade the graphics card and external storage is the main way that most actual real editors doing actual real work do things anyway.
Where are all of the idiots who were saying that there would not be a pro machine?
This forum is full of people who deserve Windows and always will deserve windows.
Lance
-
[Joseph W. Bourke] “but I think that the lack of the ability to upgrade the cpu and other components will make it an orphan sooner than you think.”
You mean like you could upgrade all the previous pro machines? The ridiculous comments are facinating.
-
Love seeing the naysayers and I am reminded of this quote:
“They have no taste. And I mean that in an important way.”
-
Around the Xmas holiday, many folks who had paid for the FULL CS6 suite (not Creative Cloud) began to get dialogs insisting that they were on the Creative Cloud, that their software was about to expire and that they had to reenter their reg numbers.
After doing so things would work for a few days and then the dialog would appear again.
It took weeks for Adobe to finally issue a fix.
As soon as Adobe gets a large percentage of users on the Creative Cloud, I wonder where the incentive will be for them to innovate will lie?
Lance
-
An yet this is something different. And despite the fact that it is not intended as an NLE, in this forum anything that is different than FCPX is better than FCPX. That is the basic thought process of some folks in this forum.
Lance
-
No, I didn’t mean to imply that anyone from Adobe was badmouthing Apple here.
That stuff is done by what appears to be a dedicated small group of posters who hate what they think FCPX is. It’s fascinating to see their need to stick around in this forum.
As FCPX gets better (which it certainly has done), these detractors appear less and less reasonable (to me anyway). And more and more funny.
Lance
-
Yes, I see that, what with the Premiere managers supporting their products here in the FCPX forum.
There is no doubt that Premiere is a fine NLE.
One has to wonder at the need some have to come here to justify their decision to go over to Premiere by badmouthing Apple’s equally fine NLE.
Lance