Sometimes tracks make complex editorial movements “easier” than than connected clips. And sometimes they make editing much easier.
If only all projects were “cuts only” like in the good old days of machine-to-machine, then management would be a no-brainer. One track, no waiting. I do concede that X has some internal mechanisms that are a leap forward – we’d be just as incensed if its reach did not exceed its grasp. This has all been discussed to death. However, just like audio used to be relegated to third world status sucking hind tit behind glamorous video, the real-world requirements for all the deliverables permutations that we are now faced with seem to have been glossed over, and forces some serious workarounds. Texted, textless, seamless, break structure variations, audio hierarchy in all its DolbyE, stereo, stems, surrounds, and have I left anything out yet? Oh yes, the extended versions with snap ins and alternate language/international window elements… but wait there’s undoubtedly more, and no, this is no longer just a broadcaster issue, because all distributors want all these things plus, oh, you know, several layers of assignable polylingual subtitles. Not unusual for me to be working in three or four languages now.
It would be amusing to see how long the audio engineers of the world would have taken to line up the offending parties ‘against the wall’ if the magnetic one-track mind had suggested that they no longer needed multitrack as an operating hierarchy. It would not have gotten out of alpha.
jPo
“I always pass on free advice — its never of any use to me” Oscar Wilde.