[Jordan Cadby]

Hey Hey

havent tried this… but copy and paste to the object then link that to a null, appropriately rotate the null (90 degrees), then rotate the object back to you so its facing the camera again…

is that clear? hmm basically rotate an attached null to send the path off back in z space. or you could just past the motion path on to the null and attach an object (your layer) to it, but perpendicular… making a t shape

let me know if it pans out

JC

in the shade

[Jordan Cadby]

Hey

Cheers for the advice, its good to get some from someone who has used both systems… I think though, i have convinced myself to hold out for the RED Scarlet!!!

Thankyou

JC

in the shade

[Jordan Cadby]

well after a we bit of tweaking it does seam to be working….
how very odd… i cant see why… and there seems to be some weird relationship between the partical life and how far along the path they go. BUT!!! low and behold, pretty much exacly what i wanted! thankyou very much

JC

in the shade

[Jordan Cadby]

Holy Cr*p!!!

Thats awesome, ill try it later today! Thanks ever so much!

J

in the shade

[Jordan Cadby]

wow that is actually more clever than i could have imagined!!!!

and pretty useful… just when you think AFX has let you down!!!

in the shade

[Jordan Cadby]

Ahoy

I to am venturing into upgrading my system…
one thing i found out is that its likely that quad core processors are soon to be getting a big price cut (probally to make way for a new version on themselves), so im leaving it for a month or so to see if thats true… anothing thing some one suggested to me, was to get a graphics card from ebay… because ALOT of gamers are constantly upgrading there cards so that can play the latest games, so they end up selling perfectly decent cards for nothing!!! Thank god for HALO!!!

Good luck

in the shade

[Jordan Cadby]

im starting to get this message now… all the time… its extremely annoying