I know this thread is a few month old, but I’ve just been reading up on DVD authoring and came across it. I love that this resource is here for people to explore, I continue to learn so much just by scrolling down the forum lists!
After reading this thread, would it be correct to say that the way a Progressive video is encoded on to a DVD is Progressive segmented Frames (PsF)?
It seems to me that the encoder is taking a 30p, (or really, 29.97p) splitting it up into two fields that exist at the same point in time. So even though it is being drawn as an interlaced signal, there is no temporal shift on the display, thus no interlaced artifacts.
Is it correct to think about this process this way?
Thanks!
joel