Forum Replies Created

Page 3 of 3
  • Jesus Silva

    September 11, 2009 at 5:40 am in reply to: Apple XDCAM 25P to 23.976 lose 4-channel audio Help!

    So, you have to convert first the XDCAM footage to ProRess then conform in FCP?

    Can you do that instead in compressor in one step?
    We need work on 23.976 not 24P.

    “Equations are more important to me, because politics is for the present, but an equation is something for eternity.”
    Albert Einstein

  • Jesus Silva

    September 11, 2009 at 4:42 am in reply to: Apple XDCAM 25P to 23.976 lose 4-channel audio Help!

    Thanks for the response Rafael but can you expand further on your suggestion.

    Thanks.

    “Equations are more important to me, because politics is for the present, but an equation is something for eternity.”
    Albert Einstein

  • Jesus Silva

    September 11, 2009 at 4:01 am in reply to: Apple XDCAM 25P to 23.976 lose 4-channel audio Help!

    If we do pass thought the video is out of sync.
    We are converting from 25P to 23.976.

    “Equations are more important to me, because politics is for the present, but an equation is something for eternity.”
    Albert Einstein

  • I have the motion tracker working but I get a trail from the particles. How I can get the particles to follow the whole movement with out leaving a trail?

    Just to clarify my task is having a explosion coming from an electronic equipment following the movement of the camera.

    Thanks,

    “Equations are more important to me, because politics is for the present, but an equation is something for eternity.”
    Albert Einstein

  • Jesus Silva

    July 8, 2008 at 7:59 pm in reply to: Editing at a distance.

    Hey Mark,
    I will love to be on site but in this case is not an option for this project I understand I will lose some the chemistry and much more that goes on productions.

    However, the producer and I we where talking about the idea of having a good edit assistant there (Tucson) to create a FCP project then mirror the project and the media to other driver, then ship it to L.A.

    That way will be possible to email the project file with the latest edit to the producer/director in Tucson to check the progress instead to have to compress sequences and send the over the web.

    Has anyone try this approach before?

    Thanks,

    “Equations are more important to me, because politics is for the present, but an equation is something for eternity.”
    Albert Einstein

  • Jesus Silva

    July 8, 2008 at 7:49 pm in reply to: Editing at a distance.

    The producer and I we where talking about the idea of
    having a good edit assistant there (Tucson) to create a FCP project then mirror the project and the media to other driver, then ship it to L.A.

    That way will be possible to email the project file with the latest edit to the producer/director to check the progress instead to have to compress sequences and send the over the web.

    Has anyone try this approach before?

    Thanks,

    “Equations are more important to me, because politics is for the present, but an equation is something for eternity.”
    Albert Einstein

Page 3 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy