Since this is a show shot on 5D and XDCAM instead of RED, what would be the difference if I just did a created a render of the whole show with out graphics.
My client will wonder why I just can’t take a render of the show with out graphics instead of charging him hours of conform time.
I still need to prep the timeline and take out graphics and heavy Final Cut plugin effect shots but I would save time overall by letting Final Cut do the frame rate conversion. For this particular project it seems to be doing well with a mix of 23.98 and 59.94 footage. I have had projects in the past that needed a manual conform of frame rates, for instance 25 to 29.97, but for this project it seems like Final Cut is doing a good job on its own.
I realize the slight generation loss by using a render but if I use ProRes HQ would I really be loosing anything visually compared to the original footage? In my experience I have not seen the generation loss when using ProRes HQ.
Is there any other reason that I would need to do a manual conform on this type of compressed footage (5D and XDCAM) as opposed to a “baked” render of the show?
Thanks