Jay Lee
Forum Replies Created
-
Jay Lee
August 30, 2012 at 4:46 pm in reply to: Which High Quality Codec Output for WEB Destination Only?Thank you Sareesh and Joseph. So good of you to take the time to reply with such depth. In a nutshell no significant quality gains in maintaining an RGB workflow from Resolve vs. Uncompressed YUV especially for a H264 WEB delivery.
We shall push in with 10bit uncompressed approach.Regards,
J
-
Jay Lee
August 29, 2012 at 9:46 pm in reply to: Which High Quality Codec Output for WEB Destination Only?Thank you Stig.
Our concern is not so much the RGB out of Resolve or the resulting H264 conversion but the fact that we are adding titles and audio in Final Cut Pro with the Resolve renders. Its the final output from FCP that seems to be shrouded in mystery in terms of does it really render 12bit RGB??J
-
Jay Lee
August 12, 2012 at 6:45 pm in reply to: Re: Cant Keyframe ‘Qualifier’ blur parameter – 9.0b2 Beta MacAh ha. Got it now. That is indeed the missing link.
To animate all keyer attributes one must have both a Color Correction dynamic mark AND Qualifier mark.So appreciate you patience.
Thank you.
Cheers,
J
-
Jay Lee
August 12, 2012 at 8:48 am in reply to: Re: Cant Keyframe ‘Qualifier’ blur parameter – 9.0b2 Beta MacI beg your pardon gentlemen this is simply not so. Try this:
1. Add a dynamic mark and then qualify your selection.
2. Switch on ‘Auto Key framing for the qualifier.
3. Move the play head to a different frame in the clip.
4. This is the GOTCHA. With OUT adding a dynamic mark manually manipulate either the blur, shrink or off-set parameters in the qualifier. Notice that NONE of these settings changes will result in Resolve inserting an auto key-frame. It isn’t until a Hue, Saturation or Luminance parameter is adjusted that a dynamic mark is inserted.Please understand that Auto key-framing in its self is not the issue here its the fact that the ‘Blur’ parameter is not being recognized as a key-framable attribute wether auto or manual marks are used.
Most appreciate your perseverance with this. Thank you.
Best,
J
-
Jay Lee
August 12, 2012 at 12:36 am in reply to: Re: Cant Keyframe ‘Qualifier’ blur parameter – 9.0b2 Beta MacWe’re losing our minds here 🙂
Have tried three different systems (all Mac) with following ‘test’.On a single shot we pull a simple key with the qualifier including leaving the blur to default (-100). We place a qualifier dynamic Mark on this the first frame. Go to the last frame and add a dynamic Mark and change the qualifier blur to +100. We see the blur change both in numerical values and its effect on the key.
Now…… we go back to the first frame dynamic Mark and it has ALSO changed from its original (-100) to +100. No question. Have repeated it many times. It is not interpolating.
This happens regardless of PTZR mode and/or Auto keyframe enabled.
J
-
Jay Lee
August 11, 2012 at 11:44 pm in reply to: Re: Cant Keyframe ‘Qualifier’ blur parameter – 9.0b2 Beta MacHmmmm…….we have noticed when key-framing other parameters that pausing the playhead between dynamic marks doesn’t cause a numerical display change even though there is a visual interpretation.
This is not what we are referring to in the original post. The blur qualifier parameter is not being interpolated. A modified value on one dynamic mark is changing all marks?Thank you for your thoughts.
J
-
Thank you Sascha.
Cheers,
J
-
Doh!!! Of course…….Thank you.
J