Forum Replies Created

Page 37 of 104
  • Jason Brown

    January 3, 2011 at 3:45 pm in reply to: Text size change in share YouTube format

    Hey Jeremy,

    Great information! I didn’t know this…MOST stuff I do is h264 and I use Matrox CompressHD…so virtual cluster isn’t something I use often…but good to know that “Send To” can’t take advantage of that!

    -Jason

  • Jason Brown

    December 31, 2010 at 3:54 am in reply to: Upconverting Digital SD Footage to HD

    OK…so after reading Jeremy and Shane’s comments…I take it that it’s a “your experience may vary”? Should I digitize and look at them to compare?

    I have a project taking some decent looking masters from betacam – anamorphic 16×9 and converting them to a digital format to get rid of the analog tapes.

    Should I capture them to an SD ProRes codec…or should I upconvert…I’ll be using an MXO2 for this project…not my Kona.

    The final use of these isn’t determined…it’s archive at this point…but space won’t be an issue.

    -Jason

  • Jason Brown

    December 31, 2010 at 3:48 am in reply to: Text size change in share YouTube format

    [Dave LaRonde] “I don’t trust that “Send to Compressor” thing.”

    Dave…I’m losing faith in you! 🙂

    I use that function literally – daily! It works perfectly (with this issue being an exception). It is ONE of my main 2 reasons I suggest upgrading to FCP7.

    Yes, your workflow of exporting a same as source type of file in a QT container will fix the issue. The only time this issue occurs is when using non-square pixel comps (DVCPROHD, HDV, NTSC…etc) in conjunction with having an FCP generated font.

    The fix – precomping into a square pixel sequence – or not using the text tool to generate any text…use motion or photoshop.

    I haven’t tested…and would be interested to see if you have the same issue with a QT reference file…because that is basically what the “share” and “send to” functions are doing.

    I love the send-to workflow…it is super fast, and you don’t have to create any intermediate files.

    -Jason

  • Jason Brown

    December 30, 2010 at 11:23 pm in reply to: Text size change in share YouTube format

    Dave,

    This haPpens with the send to compressor command as well. I don’t use the share function.

  • Jason Brown

    December 30, 2010 at 11:18 pm in reply to: Text size change in share YouTube format

    This is because you are using a non-square pixel sequence and a text generator filter.

    I’ve been trying to figure this out for months. U are the only person I’ve ever heard experience this. Plz confirm u r using a non square seq and I’ll let u know my solutions…

  • Jason Brown

    December 30, 2010 at 11:12 pm in reply to: Upconverting Digital SD Footage to HD

    So jus to beat a dead horse 🙂

    There is NO quality advantage to up converting 16×9 SD footage to HD? correct?

    I’ve always been confused about this because I was sold a kona card from a dealer making the claim of higher quality results…although I had my doubts…

  • Jason Brown

    December 30, 2010 at 8:49 pm in reply to: Upconverting Digital SD Footage to HD

    I’ve always wondered why this would be done…is there advantage to taking, say 16×9 anamorphic sd betacam and upconverting to 1920?

    I’ve always thought there is a ceiling…sd can only look as good as sd…right? Its like dubbing cassette tape to cd, will only sound as good as a tape can sound. Is it a workflow thing? Easier to mix sd into hd timeline by upconverting?

  • Jason Brown

    December 30, 2010 at 3:10 pm in reply to: Can some explain “average audio level”

    How much? I’ve been using -6db…but think -7 would work too.

    Is there a way to batch process multiple music tracks this way? (doing it in the browser…not in the timeline)

    -Jason

  • Jason Brown

    December 30, 2010 at 2:08 pm in reply to: Can some explain “average audio level”

    I have something I was going to post independently…but I think it fits here.

    I don’t do any broadcast, all of my work is for in-house productions. But in regards to audio levels…I always have to reduce the level of music tracks – (Network audio CD’s – downloaded royalty free tracks – Firstcom downloads).

    I remember on my old AVID Meridien that I had to reduce by -7db before I even did anything. If I leave them at 0 in FCP, they are distorted on playback and I have to take them down about -6 or -7 to sound good…is this a common workflow? Am I doing something wrong?

    -Jason

    P.S.

    [john sklba] “CC has been amazing at helping me learn things. Walter I am honored by you responding…”

    John, you’ll find this forum to be FILLED with talented and knowledgeable people. It astounds me how much I’ve learned here…I try to give back when I can. I’ll take this opportunity to add a thanks to walter and others for all the “professional development” I’ve gotten from CC over the years! 🙂

  • Jason Brown

    December 30, 2010 at 1:00 pm in reply to: Workflow: Pluraleyes + FCP + 5D + H4N – Overambitious?

    Hey alf,

    While I agree that it is alot of work for an interview…it’s a great look compared to a standard 1/3 or 2/3 type camera with standard efp or eng lens.

    I think the solution is simply back to basics….clap a slate. We used to do it when film was only option.

Page 37 of 104

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy