Activity › Forums › AJA Video Systems › Upconverting Digital SD Footage to HD
-
Upconverting Digital SD Footage to HD
Posted by Anthony Phillip on December 30, 2010 at 6:43 pmIs it possible to upconvert digital SD files (footage thats already been captured) to HD using the Kona LHi?
Lawrence Marshall replied 15 years, 4 months ago 6 Members · 10 Replies -
10 Replies
-
Jason Brown
December 30, 2010 at 8:49 pmI’ve always wondered why this would be done…is there advantage to taking, say 16×9 anamorphic sd betacam and upconverting to 1920?
I’ve always thought there is a ceiling…sd can only look as good as sd…right? Its like dubbing cassette tape to cd, will only sound as good as a tape can sound. Is it a workflow thing? Easier to mix sd into hd timeline by upconverting?
-
Jeremy Garchow
December 30, 2010 at 8:59 pm“Easier to mix sd into hd timeline by upconverting?”
Precisely.
-
Jason Brown
December 30, 2010 at 11:12 pmSo jus to beat a dead horse 🙂
There is NO quality advantage to up converting 16×9 SD footage to HD? correct?
I’ve always been confused about this because I was sold a kona card from a dealer making the claim of higher quality results…although I had my doubts…
-
Jeremy Garchow
December 31, 2010 at 12:29 amHigher quality results from what? That’s a statement that needs a proper context.
No matter what, sd will never be hd. There is very expensive and dedicate xhardware that does pretty nice work, but it’s still not hd.
When up converting with a capture card, the quality is pretty good, it’s real time and inexpensive.
I would not recommend up converting and editing an entire sd sourced show in hd just because you can.
-
Shane Ross
December 31, 2010 at 2:57 amUpconverting SD to HD via a capture card like the Kona 3 or LHi is a HARDWARE upconversion. The resulting image is far superior to that of just dropping an SD captured clip into an HD timeline and rendering. The difference is so great that my wife could tell the difference.
Shane
GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Jason Brown
December 31, 2010 at 3:54 amOK…so after reading Jeremy and Shane’s comments…I take it that it’s a “your experience may vary”? Should I digitize and look at them to compare?
I have a project taking some decent looking masters from betacam – anamorphic 16×9 and converting them to a digital format to get rid of the analog tapes.
Should I capture them to an SD ProRes codec…or should I upconvert…I’ll be using an MXO2 for this project…not my Kona.
The final use of these isn’t determined…it’s archive at this point…but space won’t be an issue.
-Jason
-
Jeremy Garchow
December 31, 2010 at 4:03 amIf going for an archive and throwing away the original media, I personally, would capture in SD.
You can always convert later if you need to, but you’ll never be able to get the originals back.
Yes, testing and taking a look is always best. Your needs might be different from what I would do.
-
Joseph Owens
December 31, 2010 at 8:02 pmThe vast majority of my work is 1920×1080, 16×9. That said, many of my clients bring a mix of source material, which I naturally “upconvert” or at least digitize off tape (superior results using the Kona3 input) at that resolution. It does not convert SD into HD by inventing lost detail — it merely oversamples something that was 720×486 — and if the original was very high quality, you can expect not to lose anything.
The real trick with a lot of legacy footage is that its 4×3, or worse, 16×9 letterboxed. Best case scenario is that the DBeta, or whatever, was mastered 16×9 anamorphic. That actually works quite well. Nevertheless, even the Kona “blow-up” strategies work amazingly well.
I am required to do software “uprez” as well. Case in point a couple of days ago, I got a downloaded al-Jazeera clip (intended for a 1080i60 timeline) which arrived 1280×720 25p mpg4. Is there anything about this clip which isn’t completely wrong for its intended use? But Compressor, cranked up to its “best” settings, at least yielded a result which the producer said looked “a bit too good”, now we have to put all the station bugs back in to make it look like streamed media again. All I see that’s really objectionable, artifact-wise, besides a general softness, is of course the mpg block compression.
jPo
You mean “Old Ben”? Ben Kenobi?
-
Lawrence Marshall
January 4, 2011 at 5:16 pmLast year I worked on a film that was shot standard DV 4×3. I submitted it to various film festivals (it has been screened at 37 festivals thus far). Several of the festivals accepted only HDCAM for screening masters. I took my Mac Pro to a local post house, hooked it up to one of their HDCAM decks, and sent my standard DV timeline through my Kona LHI card, upconverting in real time to HiDef (with pillarboxing for the 4×3). I went to one of the festivals (the Woodstock Film Festival) and saw my film projected on a fairly large screen in a theater from the HDCAM tape. It looked extremely good from a picture quality standpoint.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up