Forum Replies Created

Page 45 of 103
  • James Ewart

    August 29, 2014 at 4:30 pm in reply to: “Disabling” video of clip but not audio

    And another thing.

    Why not call “Reveal in Event Browser” “Match Frame”?

    That one really is beyond the pale.

  • James Ewart

    August 29, 2014 at 4:20 pm in reply to: “Disabling” video of clip but not audio

    At the end of the day though what I have found is a lot of the time the audio adjustments you want to make can be made by simply expanding the audio. And then collapsing. It does require a slightly different thought process but most of the time it’s all you need.

  • James Ewart

    August 29, 2014 at 4:03 pm in reply to: “Disabling” video of clip but not audio

    Apologies and thank you for picking up on that I meant “Reveal in Event Browser” .

    For my (as you have previously already established) seriously flawed personality it would be logical if one has a “detach audio” command to also have an “attach audio” command.

  • James Ewart

    August 29, 2014 at 3:48 pm in reply to: Media Sharing

    “… the file structure of FCP X is better positioned to allow multiple users to access the same library at the same time ”

    In such a scenario how would I prevent you messing with my project/timeline inadvertently for example?

    I guess some kind of virtual lock?

  • James Ewart

    August 29, 2014 at 12:50 pm in reply to: Media Sharing

    Thanks Oliver

    I can’t get my head round two or more people using the same files at the same time but I guess that’s what Video on Demand is all about.

    oh well – it’s good to know one’s limitations. ; – D

  • James Ewart

    August 29, 2014 at 11:48 am in reply to: “Disabling” video of clip but not audio

    I know one can work round this (reveal in finder and drop in to timeline again) but the inability to ‘reattach audio’ is something I have never understood. I am guessing there is a very good reason why you can’t… anyone know?

  • James Ewart

    August 28, 2014 at 4:25 pm in reply to: FCP X destroying audio edits in XML output

    I’ve heard people ay they prefer the loom of 24 over 25 – I always thought that was a bit far fetched an argument being that 24 looked more “filmic” then 25. More of a film versus tape argument from way back.

    But the look of 24/25 over 30? Hmmm never heard that. 30 more clinical for your money? Something in the magic of that drop frame thingy? … I wonder … the fact that it is not a perfect fit? Maybe.

    Transfer 24 to 25…. bit of a tone change in audio but doesn’t look so weird I don’t think.

  • James Ewart

    August 28, 2014 at 3:19 pm in reply to: FCP X destroying audio edits in XML output

    I’ll check it out.

    We have definitely seen a return to quality from the BBC due to competition from the American series like 24 (last series a bit disappointing), Blue Bloods (bit schmaltzy but I love it) and True Detectives (who mixed the audio though?) to name a few that have done really well here.

  • James Ewart

    August 28, 2014 at 3:13 pm in reply to: FCP X destroying audio edits in XML output

    Don’t even understand why we don’t all shoot 30FPS for Cinema?

    Would that not be nice? A whole world united at 30FPS.

    You know (sorry off topic again) I don’t have any experience of this, but I think that we do a straight transfer of 24 FPS to 25FPS for TV. Certainly we used to in film days.

  • James Ewart

    August 28, 2014 at 3:10 pm in reply to: FCP X destroying audio edits in XML output

    No I missed that Jeremy but will see if I can download. Was it good?

Page 45 of 103

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy