Jake Blackstone
Forum Replies Created
-
No!!! You will buy the $30K BM panel and you will like it:-)
-
I moved on, no need to re-invent the wheel…
-
I tried that, but that doesn’t work as well. V10 has things, that V9 doesn’t understand, such as temporal NR, different window types and OFX…
-
My project has 6 layers of video, mixed frame rates and a mixture of mxf, dpx and mov. And, as I said, it’s a complete no go. In other words my project is a bit more complicated:-)
-
From what I can see in the new XML, Resolve 10 writes original .MXF names instead of new QT .mov names. I could do the find and replace, but frankly I had enough, I’m just going to re-do it in 9.
-
I tried to open it with FCPX and it still no go.
-
It’s in version 10 under Primary 1 page
-
Thanks Rohit for the quick answer.
The visual feedback of the bypass is very important. Frankly, I had some difficulties deciding what mode I was in without having visual conformation of the bypass. In remote grading situation it’s even more critical, as now I can’t just ask the client if there is a cross thru the node… -
You’ll be hard pressed to stress your two existing 680s as is. On the other hand in version 10 you’ll need all the power you can squeeze into your computer. With my three CUDA cards (570+2×680) a single Bleach bypass OFX filter causes non-real time playback. So, yes, an extra 680 will come very handy in V10. And don’t forget the upcoming Red GPU debayer.
-
Can you state clearly what GPU cards you have installed right now. I’m having trouble understanding your hardware set up.