“This guy seems to be saying that in our industry, leveraging content for additional use (I guess kinda the equivalent of business metrics that focus on generating “incremental sales” in retailing.) is a big potential profit driver that should be taken very seriously.
Are you saying that this *isn’t* the case in media production, that it “shouldn’t” be – or maybe that a video asset is something essentially different from any other type of business asset?”
My rant had nothing to do with his opinion about media, it had to do with his bizarre analogy to the book Moneyball. Every last statement he made about the book is totally wrong, bizarrely so.
It seems to me if your going to try making analogies to a book it would help if you A) read it, and then B) understood it. If you can’t be bothered with those two little items, then I don’t think I’m going to care too much about your opinions on media.
I’m more than happy to point out his lapses on a line by line basis, but I figured you just wanted to understand what pissed me off. Stupidity mostly.
Herb Sevush
Zebra Productions
—————————
nothin’ attached to nothin’
“Deciding the spine is the process of editing” F. Bieberkopf