Forum Replies Created

Page 27 of 27
  • What I mean by ‘Clunky’ is that you have to constantly move windows around to get to the colorfx, audiofx. etc. The screen real estate doesn’t seem to be very ‘streamlined’ to me. This is just my opinion. I’m sure there are lots of people out there who love the media 100 interface.

    Greg

  • I haven’t edited on a Media100 in 3 or 4 years so I thought I’d see if the software interface had progressed much since version 7. The only additional benifit I can see, is it now has a source and Program monitor and the ability to have mulitple video tracks. Final Cut pro and Avid have had this since the beginning. I didn’t see anything that would make me even think about switching back. The interface is still clunky to me. Just thought I’d put my 2 cents in.

    Greg

  • Greg Jones

    April 21, 2005 at 9:06 pm in reply to: A cost effective HD monitoring system…If it exists.

    I’m using the Sony pvm 14L5 14″ Multiformat monitor. It accepts all of the HD signals. It only has 800 lines of resolution, but it’s about as affordable as you can get for HD monitoring. Sony also makes the 20L5, which is the 20″ version. You can pick one up at B&H photo for around $1600. I have not had any problems. If you are doing Broadcast critical work then nothing can beat a more expensive higher quality monitor, but for most situations the 14L5 would work great!

    Greg Jones
    D7,Inc.
    Orlando,Fl.

  • Sweet. I’ll give it a try!

    Greg Jones
    D7,Inc.
    Orlando,Fl.

Page 27 of 27

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy