[Tony West] “That’s the upside of the “union relationship” it seeks to try to prevent the undercutting or “race to the bottom” if you will.
“
I don’t think that properly explains the WFH partnership between freelancer and a hiring company. In my market, there was a period of time a number of years ago where an added system rental charge was considered an acceptable added charge on top of an editors day rate. However, as remote work has become the norm this added charge was eliminated.
I agree with Mark that the WFH agreement is a classic win-win for both an editor and a facility. The facility wins because it frees up space to have another editor work on a project or it might reduce the overall office space and computer equipment needed by the company.
The editor also wins because he or she has much greater flexibility in their work day. No wasted time commuting and a flexible work schedule which allows for work/life balance – like taking care of children, doing laundry, grocery shopping, etc., etc. And as long as the pay rate is competitive with the market norms, there shouldn’t be a concern of being taken advantage of by the hiring company.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/tmprods
https://tallmanproductions.net