Forum Replies Created

  • Gray Marshall

    December 13, 2013 at 12:25 am in reply to: Resolve QT into Avid: No “Tape” Name

    … And I’ve noticed one other thing….
    the REEL info seems to populate properly in FCP7, but NOT in Avid. Weird.
    Again, any help? Is this a “Known” issue with Avid?

    Cheers,
    -Gray

  • Gray Marshall

    December 12, 2013 at 10:36 pm in reply to: Resolve QT into Avid: No “Tape” Name

    Yep… and Nope, didn’t work.

  • Gray Marshall

    September 17, 2013 at 10:27 pm in reply to: Road Case for Tangent Element

    Hi, Chris.

    Are those inserts for the Pelican 1510 available, and if so, where?

    Thanks,
    -G

  • Gray Marshall

    January 3, 2013 at 8:51 am in reply to: Grading DPX Log Files

    Well, THAT makes me feel better. Thanks, Alexis. I felt like I just wasn’t getting the “Log” controls. Still, I’m surprised that the dominant form of high-end image representation from 1994-2010 isn’t easily realized in this software. Resolve seems to be very much “about” the digital-origination formats, judging from my initial experience with it. Time & familiarity may change that opinion.

    Cheers,
    Gray

  • Gray Marshall

    October 18, 2010 at 1:38 am in reply to: Logging already converted files?

    Thank you, gentlemen.

    hehe… Good one, Jeremy (I agree, but ours is not to question why…).

    Zak: I’m going to try it both ways. The DP’s understanding (and he’s pretty good at this stuff) is that the Media Encoder does NOT use the regular QT engine, but a comparison (using Shake to look closely) thru both engines might be revealing, but even if there IS a difference, how would one know which is “better”?

    I’ll try to fake a card-like structure, but if the files are already in ProRes, will the L&T function try to re-convert or just pass it thru? Stay tuned…

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy