Forum Replies Created

Page 161 of 449
  • Graham Bernard

    May 15, 2016 at 5:20 am in reply to: Sony vegas effect

    John, do you still have access to movie uploads?

    * Grazie

    Video Content Creator and Potter
    PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
    Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge

  • Graham Bernard

    May 15, 2016 at 5:16 am in reply to: easier way to do this?

    [ellie mercer] “i have a different way that ive thought of now but thank you for your help!”

    You’re welcome. What did you come up with?

    * Grazie

    Video Content Creator and Potter
    PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
    Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge

  • Graham Bernard

    May 14, 2016 at 2:50 pm in reply to: easier way to do this?

    Hi John. How about my last suggestion? Have the Still and the FX as Children to a Parent Track and then 3D that Parent track? But otherwise the power of Boris would need to be used.

    * Grazie

    Video Content Creator and Potter
    PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
    Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge

  • Graham Bernard

    May 14, 2016 at 8:43 am in reply to: easier way to do this?

    Oh yes… The easiest way is to make this Event part of a 3D Parent Track and use that as the moving section.

    * Grazie

    Video Content Creator and Potter
    PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
    Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge

  • Graham Bernard

    May 14, 2016 at 7:09 am in reply to: easier way to do this?

    I’m assuming you know you would need to render to a Format that has a transparent background, otherwise you’d blank the lower tracks. Yes?

    * Grazie

    Video Content Creator and Potter
    PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
    Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge

  • Graham Bernard

    May 14, 2016 at 7:03 am in reply to: easier way to do this?

    Solo just that track and render it out. Apply the FX. Done.

    * Grazie

    Video Content Creator and Potter
    PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
    Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge

  • Graham Bernard

    May 14, 2016 at 6:27 am in reply to: easier way to do this?

    [ellie mercer] “but hope this will give you a idea”

    Ah, that’s perfect!

    1] By using Pan/Crop you essentially have a still that is moving.

    2] You have an FX that is not “sticking” to the area of that still that has the highlights.

    [I believe I’ve got this correct…] OK, here’s the problem: A still/photo hasn’t a time element. Meaning it doesn’t know it is being moved! And what you have done, without knowing this, is to, logically “move” the fx relating to the still using the p/c control. Yup, messy.

    Try this: Render the movement first, then apply the Starbust FX and that SHOULD follow the move/movement of the now “footage” of the cityscape.

    Question: Are all the Layers of the Cityscape being controlled by 3D animation on layers under the JPG of the window I’m looking at? If this is so you have a complex fly-by Cityscape that I can’t see at present and my feedback is being hindered by not knowing just what you are doing below on all the Timeline Tracks.

    OK, if I am correct, then applying the Starbust FX to a renbdered-out video OR, and this is going dependent on seeing your 3D layout just possibly where you COULD add the FX – more effectively and efficiently than the Pan/Crop.

    * Grazie

    Video Content Creator and Potter
    PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
    Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge

  • Graham Bernard

    May 14, 2016 at 5:48 am in reply to: easier way to do this?

    Oh yes, that helps me, thank you.

    Can you tell me just what you are controlling in Pan/Crop – it’s not obvious to me.

    1] Pan/Crop controls the size and/or position of the Camera’s view.

    2] An FX – here that’s your “Starburst” FX – is controlled within its own keyframing.

    Please tell me what you controlling in Pan/Crop.

    Apologies for not getting the whole picture of what it is you are trying to achieve, but I’m sure we will get a solution.

    * Grazie

    Video Content Creator and Potter
    PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
    Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge

  • Graham Bernard

    May 14, 2016 at 4:45 am in reply to: easier way to do this?

    Hi! Please upload a screenshot showing more of the pan/crop area, your shot is cutting off just some of the FX controls.

    What controls are you wanted ng to do?

    * Grazie

    Video Content Creator and Potter
    PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
    Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge

  • Graham Bernard

    May 14, 2016 at 4:22 am in reply to: easier way to do this?

    [ellie mercer] “i want the city lights to stay on the building instead of trying to do it step by step in pan/crop area.”

    I understand you want more control over the FX? Yes?

    * Grazie

    Video Content Creator and Potter
    PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
    Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge

Page 161 of 449

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy