Forum Replies Created

Page 4 of 7
  • Geoff Addis

    February 26, 2013 at 10:30 pm in reply to: Better pictures

    No, unfortunately not. But don’t be disheartened because as I said before, you can get some cracking pictures. Of course it is having the right tools for the job and so if your primary work really demands the highest resolution then this is not the camera for you, but don’t forget that for many 1280x730p is the preferd format!

  • Geoff Addis

    February 25, 2013 at 10:22 pm in reply to: Better pictures

    The noise performance is influenced by the choice of file settings and I suggest that you search the web for recommendations that will best suit your style of shooting. (Have a look a dvinfo.com or able cine.com). Of course, a faster lens will help to reduce some aspects of noise, although at the loss of d.o.f.

    The camera’s resolution is more like that of an HDV camera than a top notch 1920×1080 camera, but that does not necessarily mean that it is incapable of producing fine images. Probably, you will be making use of the shallow d.o.f. that may be achieved with suitable lenses and often the quality of this type of shot will not be lessened by the lower resolution. (Just think of the use of diffusion filters, even stockings, that have been used to soften shots throughout cinema’s history1)

    Get to know the camera’s shortcomings and learn to light and shoot accordingly and you will be producing some fine cinematic images.

    Geoff

  • Geoff Addis

    February 25, 2013 at 5:32 pm in reply to: Better pictures

    In what way do you consider the image to be lacking: definition, dynamic range, colour accuracy, unwanted compression artifacts? A better understanding of your concerns will help us to make suggestions.

    Geoff

  • Geoff Addis

    January 23, 2013 at 10:03 pm in reply to: Panasonic discontinues AF100 in B & H Photo’s store

    Whilst this isn’t a major upgrade it does have a couple of improvements that are welcome. It would be great if Panasonic could offer an upgrade for owners of the AF101, I’m sure that many would be prepared to pay for such. How about it Panasonic?

    Geoff.

  • Geoff Addis

    January 18, 2013 at 2:27 pm in reply to: manual apreture solution for Blackmagic camera

    The mtf m4/3 to EF adaptor interfaces between the camera and Canon lens and there is a wired control unit that may be fitted to the pan and tilt handle. Have a look at their website for complete details.

    Geoff

  • Geoff Addis

    January 17, 2013 at 4:54 pm in reply to: manual apreture solution for Blackmagic camera

    mtf have been producing a suitable adaptor for some time See
    mtfservices.com or lensadaptor.com.

    EF Full Exposure Control Terminal

    One box, with a choice of 3 mounts, Sony PMW-F3, Sony NEX FS–100 and 700 and Panasonic AG-AF 101 (these 3 mounts are sold seperately)
    Designed and built in England
    Adjusts aperture in 1/8th stop increments.
    Displays focal length as well as aperture.
    Displays focal length while zooming
    Displays aperture ramping while zooming (for lenses with non constant aperture)
    Powered by standard AA batteries, enough for a full days shooting
    Low battery warning
    Timed auto shut-down
    Illuminated display
    Will now power lens stabilisation
    Compatible with most Canon EF lenses*, ALL Ziess lenses and most third party lenses

    Geoff

  • Geoff Addis

    January 4, 2013 at 2:16 pm in reply to: Understanding FCPX under the hood.

    Thank you, Erik

  • Geoff Addis

    January 4, 2013 at 10:01 am in reply to: Understanding FCPX under the hood.

    Is it possible to CUDA enabble the current 27inch iMac’s GPU for use with Resolve? If so, could I have the details please.

  • Geoff Addis

    January 2, 2013 at 10:59 pm in reply to: AF100 highlights handling question

    Just to clarify a point made by Trevor. I’m sure that he would not expose so that face highlights hit 100% zebra, normally something around 65% would be more appropriat and the 100% value he refered to is for scene highlight.

    Geoff.

  • Geoff Addis

    December 4, 2012 at 9:14 am in reply to: Thunderbolt or USB3 Raid?

    Interesting idea!

    I’ve seen the figure of 300 MB/s quoted for USB3 RAID 0 and the internal 2 drive RAID 0 in my MacPro gives me 212 MB/s, adequate for my use.

    I have an idea that I have seen the figure of 200MB/s quoted for the WD, but cannot recall where.

    Geoff

Page 4 of 7

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy