Forum Replies Created

Page 4 of 12
  • Gabe Strong

    February 16, 2017 at 8:31 am in reply to: Upgrading the 2009 Mac Pro?

    [Joe Marler] “For a 2009 Mac Pro, the average of the fastest entries in the GeekBench 4 CPU database is around 2,500 single-core and 13,800 multi-core. GPU performance is around 110,000, except for one entry using a GTX-980Ti which was 141,000.”

    Well, not sure why you are taking ‘an average of the entries in the CPU database.’ That is a little
    like averaging the speeds of any GPU anyone puts into the 2009 Mac Pro. The speed of the
    2009 Mac Pro in the CPU database, will depend on which CPU a person installed into the computer.
    For example, my scores were higher than the scores you quote as my single-core score was over 2,700
    and my multi-core score was over 15,000…….and this was with a single processor. People who had a
    dual processor and install dual X5690 processors are getting CPU scores in the mid to high 20,000 range.
    But plenty of people are installing CPU’s which are not much better than the ones that came ‘stock’ with
    the computer….not sure why except that they are cheaper to buy so maybe that’s it. I on the other hand,
    decided that if I was going to ‘upgrade’ it, it was worth really upgrading. So I spent the $220 for the X5690
    instead of saving a few bucks and getting something slower.

    Gabe Strong
    G-Force Productions
    http://www.gforcevideo.com

  • Gabe Strong

    February 15, 2017 at 5:10 pm in reply to: Upgrading the 2009 Mac Pro?

    I had a stock 2009 MacPro. Single quad core processor 2.66GHZ with
    a GT120 graphics card with 512MB of VRAM. I was poking around online
    one day and found an interesting Facebook group:
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/Mac.Pro.Upgrade

    These guys are all upgrading older MacPros and offer help on
    how to do it for less tech savvy people. I ended up upgrading to
    a six core 3.46GHZ processor, a 980Ti graphics card with 6GB of
    VRAM. Also installed SSDs, including a couple on an internal
    PCI card for some real speed. This setup is really fast.
    I wrote more about it on my blog here:
    https://www.alaskacameradude.blogspot.com

    Gabe Strong
    G-Force Productions
    http://www.gforcevideo.com

  • Gabe Strong

    January 28, 2017 at 4:09 pm in reply to: Final Cut Pro X – Reflecting on Six Years

    Well ok but you also said
    If you are a small production company, up to a large business,
    subscribing makes more sense for accounting and tax purposes.

    I just don’t think that’s true. It doesn’t make ‘more sense.’ You can
    deduct the costs of either one. There is no advantage at all and
    neither one ‘makes any more sense.’ They are both a tax write off.
    I guess if you are a company who is making a lot of money, CC may
    be better as you are spending MORE and therefore you have a BIGGER
    write off, maybe that’s what you meant??

    Gabe Strong
    G-Force Productions
    http://www.gforcevideo.com

  • Gabe Strong

    January 28, 2017 at 8:04 am in reply to: Final Cut Pro X – Reflecting on Six Years

    Sorry Oliver but you are actually incorrect. You can deduct the cost of FCP X from
    your taxes just as you can deduct the cost of a subscription. It may
    be done in a different place…..but you can use the section 179 deduction
    to deduct the entire cost of FCP X. Directly from the IRS website.

    ‘Essentially, Section 179 of the IRS tax code allows businesses to deduct the full purchase price of equipment and/or software purchased during the tax year. That means that if you buy a piece of equipment or software you can deduct the FULL PURCHASE PRICE.’

    Now there are some restrictions. You are limited to $500,000 in Section 179 deductions
    in any given year. But this notion that there is some sort of tax deduction
    ‘advantage’ to a subscription over a full purchase is just incorrect.

    Gabe Strong
    G-Force Productions
    http://www.gforcevideo.com

  • Gabe Strong

    January 10, 2017 at 9:11 am in reply to: Here we go. GPU in the cloud. By Subscription.

    I dunno…..so you are saying $50 a month is totally fair when it comes to CC but
    terribly expensive when it comes to high speed internet access??
    ????

    Gabe Strong
    G-Force Productions
    http://www.gforcevideo.com

  • Gabe Strong

    January 6, 2017 at 3:31 am in reply to: Here we go. GPU in the cloud. By Subscription.

    Man, we finally got 30Mb speed about two weeks ago. Before that, the fastest
    we could possibly get was 3Mb (and we were paying a lot more than $50/month for
    it!). Looking at what people say they are paying makes me shake my head. People
    sure are spoiled…..$50/month for 20Mb expensive? Wow.

    Gabe Strong
    G-Force Productions
    http://www.gforcevideo.com

  • Being able to connect a piece of video to another ‘connected clip’ instead of always
    being force to connect it to the primary storyline, is one of my most requested features.
    I’d really, really, really like it if they put that feature in.

    Gabe Strong
    G-Force Productions
    http://www.gforcevideo.com

  • Gabe Strong

    December 16, 2016 at 2:48 am in reply to: FS700R crop factor with FF lens

    First……the FS700 will NOT, NOT, NOT ‘turn a 35mm into a 52mm.’ Any 35mm lens,
    (no matter if it is a APSC 35mm or a FF 35mm) will look the exact same on
    a FS700. The only rationale behind ‘crop factor’ is to relate all lenses to
    the field of view of a full frame camera. Which you don’t need to do, unless you
    are a 5D shooter. So a 35mm lens on a FS700 will look similar to a 52mm lens on a 5D,
    but any 35mm lens will look the same on the FS700 (with one exception noted below.)
    There is no ‘APSC crop mode’ on the FS700…..it is by nature a Super 35 chip, which is
    basically APSC sized. You can’t ‘turn this crop off’, because this is the native size of the sensor.

    *Exception
    You can use a Speedbooster/focal reducer which will allow you to use full frame lenses
    on the FS700. This adapter is ‘sort of’ the opposite of the ‘doubler’ which used to be on many
    news broadcast cameras. The doubler gave you twice the reach, at the expense of losing a stop
    of light. The Speedbooster, gives you a wider field of view….and you gain a stop. What this basically
    means, is that you can use a full frame lens on a FS700…..and get the field of view that you would get
    on the full frame camera, plus you get an extra stop. If you try to use an APSC lens on a Speedbooster,
    you would get a vignette, but not the other way around.

    Gabe Strong
    G-Force Productions
    http://www.gforcevideo.com

  • Gabe Strong

    December 10, 2016 at 10:28 pm in reply to: So how are we all getting on with 10.3?

    2009 upgraded MacPro (6 core 3.46ghz CPU, 980Ti GPU, and PCI SSDs) and 2013 MacBook Pro here. FCP X 10.3.1 is lighting fast with no issues yet.

    Gabe Strong
    G-Force Productions
    http://www.gforcevideo.com

  • Gabe Strong

    November 18, 2016 at 4:26 pm in reply to: Blu-ray Authoring Software better than Toast and Encore

    Encore CS6 is what you want. No subscription, and you can create
    custom menus, buttons and script actions. It’s kind of like DVD
    Studio Pro for Blu Rays. I use it for all my Blu Rays. It’s not perfect, but
    it’s by far, the best Blu Ray authoring app I could find for Mac.

    Gabe Strong
    G-Force Productions
    http://www.gforcevideo.com

Page 4 of 12

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy