Forum Replies Created

  • Evan Cox

    February 1, 2021 at 6:42 pm in reply to: Atomos Sumo 19 Frame Rate Issue with Canon C100 Mark II

    Super helpful, thanks for sharing!

  • Evan Cox

    January 30, 2021 at 8:18 pm in reply to: Atomos Sumo 19 Frame Rate Issue with Canon C100 Mark II

    Interesting! Thanks for the reply. I’ll look into the Decimator. Feels good to at least have one more possible option to try! Ha.

  • Evan Cox

    June 20, 2017 at 5:44 pm in reply to: 5DIII Recording Glitch

    Thanks for the reply!

    The card in question was an SD card. 95 MB/s Class 10 UHS Speed Class 3. Format appears to be exFAT.

    Currently for my three camera setup I’m running on two CF cards and one SD. Maybe I should switch to all CF…

    Thoughts?

    Thanks again for the help!

    -Evan

  • Evan Cox

    April 6, 2017 at 5:43 pm in reply to: Making LCD TV Screens Look Good in Background

    Yeah, that’s pretty much what I expected. I asked for nicer cameras when I got here but budgets kept us to 5Ds and a couple of lite panels. I’ll keep making the best of it until the new budgets come around and I can start to fulfill my wishlist.

    And yeah, I’ve been making videos for radio stations for the past 7 years now and I can confirm, radio studio lighting is hell on video.

    Thanks for the response!

    -Evan

  • Evan Cox

    October 26, 2014 at 11:59 pm in reply to: Playback severely delayed when audio enabled…

    Makes sense to me! Unfortunately I don’t know if that’s the case. Honestly I’m not entirely certain how to check where the audio is pointing to but I’ve tried pulling in a new file and transcoding the audio along with the video and I’ve gotten the same results unfortunately. Is there an easy way I can check this out?

    Thanks for the help! Very much appreciated.

  • Evan Cox

    December 28, 2012 at 9:22 pm in reply to: Looking for the best workflow for the highest quality

    Makes sense to me! Thanks Dave!

  • Evan Cox

    December 28, 2012 at 6:45 pm in reply to: Looking for the best workflow for the highest quality

    So I guess my last question would be, why is exporting a self contained QT video (ProRes 422) and then Compressing it to H.264 a better option than sending a ProRes 422 sequence directly from FCP to Compressor? Not trying to be difficult, just wanting to get a real grasp on the subject.

    Thanks again for all of the help!

  • Evan Cox

    December 28, 2012 at 5:53 pm in reply to: Looking for the best workflow for the highest quality

    Yeah when I’m shooting these events single cam I’m shooting 1080 – 60p AVCHD on a Sony NXCam. Certain events require multiple cameras which requires us to use what we have (various Sony Camcorders and FlipCams) which create different file types. Using the converter that I’ve been supplied with but will look into a better one. Thanks! This is all very helpful!.

  • Evan Cox

    December 27, 2012 at 11:57 pm in reply to: Looking for the best workflow for the highest quality

    Thanks I will definitely try working more with Apple Pro Res 422. The only problem is my converter doesn’t have that as an option for a codec. Again that is only necessary to use when I’m doing multi-cam shoots. The majority of these projects are single cam in which case I can definitely log and transfer as Pro Res to a Pro Res sequence. Going with the theme here, should I use an Apple Pro Res 422 setting in Compressor?

    Thanks again! This is exactly what I was looking for.

  • Evan Cox

    December 27, 2012 at 10:50 pm in reply to: Looking for the best workflow for the highest quality

    I convert with H.264. My FCP sequence is set to DV/DVCPRO – NTSC.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy