Forum Replies Created

Page 7 of 22
  • Eli Mavros

    October 18, 2007 at 6:29 pm in reply to: Export Problem

    I thought that seemed a bit odd. I don’t know why it isn’t showing up. Well, I just installed FCP 6 the other day and haven’t done any updates to it yet…so maybe I should try that. Do you recommend the latest release of v6? No major bugs to look out for?

    Thanks,
    Eli

  • Eli Mavros

    October 18, 2007 at 6:01 pm in reply to: Export Problem

    I only get the “current” option if I try to export a sequence, but not if I export a clip from the viewer.

  • Eli Mavros

    October 18, 2007 at 5:17 pm in reply to: Export Problem

    Right. But there is not easy setup for 10 and 8 bit HD sequences in the out of the box FCP, so you would custom create and easy setup, right? Well, I was just tooling around with the fixed format thing and decided to edit in a DVCProHD timeline, even though the footage was 8bit (don’t ask me why). Anyhow, I am just match framing the shots and then exporting from the viewer to send shots out to rotoscope. So, as you can see, I am actually not exporting from a sequence. Also, does “current” match your sequence settings or your easy setup? I know I could just make my own easy setup and be off and running, but just wondering.

    Best,
    Eli

  • Eli Mavros

    October 18, 2007 at 4:45 pm in reply to: Export Problem

    Why doesn’t FCP have built in 10 and 8 bit HD settings? Why are there only uncompressed 422 settings for NTSC and PAL formats?

  • Eli Mavros

    October 17, 2007 at 10:26 pm in reply to: Adding Pulldown back in to video

    Wouldn’t using the “conform” function in Cinema Tools to convert 24p to 29.97 just speed the footage up and not add pulldown?

    Best,
    eli

  • Eli Mavros

    October 9, 2007 at 10:02 pm in reply to: Selecting people only from a video clip by their motion?

    That would be sweet indeed, but I don’t think you are going to find anything like. Sorry.

    Best,
    Eli

  • Eli Mavros

    October 5, 2007 at 9:33 pm in reply to: 720×540 or 720×547

    Don’t ask me…if I were doing it I would design in non-square…but I work with dozens of different designers who all do it a certain way (I guess the way they were originally taught), and they aren’t going to change there ways to please little ol’ me. I think it may have to do with the fact that we work with a lot of 3D and I know that Maya and the like is very specific about how it handles things…but that is just a guess. The best is when working on a big project and everyone is doing it differently…it is amazing how disorganized a lot of companies are…I guess it has a lot to do with them being mostly freelance based without a set up company guidelines. I don’t usually play a lead role on projects, otherwise I would make sure that everyone was on the same page (as it is I try my hardest to do this).

  • Eli Mavros

    October 5, 2007 at 5:36 pm in reply to: 720×540 or 720×547

    HA!

    Thanks for the amusing response Dave. Yeah…I only believe half of anything I read in the Apple manuals. It is a pain though to be the guy who is always complaining to my co-workders about things not being done the “right” way, when it nearly always only applies to how FCP does things.

    Best,
    Eli

  • Eli Mavros

    September 20, 2007 at 8:12 pm in reply to: If I could have one thing for xmas…

    I agree that a quicktime is easier…for me. But as Alan said, it is generally better for the motion gfx people to work with image sequences. I know about making a qt out of image sequences with QT Pro, After Effects, Motion, etc…I even have Silver Stack (which is great for DPX work…just used it for the first time). But I just want to be able to load the image sequence right into FCP without doing any of those intermediate steps…which end up just taking a lot of time even though they are simple.

    Best,
    Eli

  • Eli Mavros

    September 6, 2007 at 9:01 pm in reply to: Ken Stone 24p DVD method not working

    Hey man,
    Thanks for your help. So indeed it worked…I don’t know why DVDSP cannot tell you somewhere that your asset is truly 23.98, but at least now I know not to trust it…but it seems like one would be setting themselves up for a lot of errors with this inaccuracy. I built the DVD and then I took the VOB into MPEG Streamclip and it read the video stream as 23.98. Awesome. This all came about because an audio house asked if we could give them a DVD to score to. Someone here made a DVD from a 24p quicktime using Compressor and DVDSP. The audio house gave us back VO tracks that were 31 and 1/2 seconds long and said the the video was that long and shouldn’t it be 30 seconds? Well, that confused the hell out of me, and I just figured the DVD had been made wrong and the discrepancy in length had to do with someone on our end making a 29.97 dvd from a 23.98 quicktime without doing it the right way. But I just happened to check the VOB of the DVD that the audio house worked off of…and lo and behold it is 23.98, and 30 seconds long (well a couple of frames short…most likely due to MPEG2 I frames or something). So I guess that I can conclude two things from today 1. I now know how to successfully make a 24p DVD and 2. The audio house must have f***d up on their end.

    Good day.

    Best,
    Eli

Page 7 of 22

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy