Edwin Gendron
Forum Replies Created
-
Edwin Gendron
September 29, 2009 at 6:38 pm in reply to: weird message box? post production could not be performed…ok, thanks.
edwin gendron
-
Edwin Gendron
September 29, 2009 at 6:17 pm in reply to: weird message box? post production could not be performed…how about using a fast modern (borrowed) computer to convert to prores then to Apple intermediate codec then using *that* to edit with?
edwin gendron
-
Edwin Gendron
September 29, 2009 at 6:07 pm in reply to: weird message box? post production could not be performed…have succesfully made a DVD w short clips of canon footage and matched to dv footage.
workflow is extremely slow though.edwin gendron
-
Edwin Gendron
September 29, 2009 at 6:05 pm in reply to: weird message box? post production could not be performed…not my camera.
It *is* my footage.
can you advise?edwin gendron
-
Edwin Gendron
September 29, 2009 at 6:03 pm in reply to: weird message box? post production could not be performed…running:
G5 powerPC 1.6G ram
FCP 4.5 hd (old timer)
QT v7.6.4.I *have* to avoid buying “stuff”.
I *do* have to make this work somehow.
-edgedwin gendron
-
Edwin Gendron
September 29, 2009 at 4:19 pm in reply to: weird message box? post production could not be performed…oh man,
I dont have prores. and compressor wants to take 10 hrs (no kidding) to do a ten minute clip.any other ideas?
thank you
-edgedwin gendron
-
what codec were you using?
just h.264?
or Prores?
or apple intermediate codec?
if H.264, perhaps it was due to the high compresssion?
edwin gendronedwin gendron
-
well, im afraid compressor works well but takes longer than i have to give it.
for now Im sticking with chewing gum, rubber bands, FCP 4.5HD and an equally old version of after effects.
incidentally, Im extremely hesitant to say this but …I think i finally have it worked out.
I tried Mpeg exporter and that was indeed a handy program. however it lacked control over the *pixels*. Also tried FCP, compressor, quicktime, and I finally went back to After effects and discovered a plethora of options for pixels.
… and believe me it makes a difference…Pixel choice changed the actual *shape* of the frame (longer vs shorter), thereby compressing the image (horizontally) and causing angular things to compress and not match up properly.
In after effects, I clicked the box for D1 instead of the native *square pixels* and voila.
some angular things still have occasional blocky edges *within* FCP … but sharpen up nicely to their *intended* look upon output.
(this may simply be FCP 4.5HD showing its age.)
fingers crossed.gendron, ed
-
well, im afraid compressor works well but takes longer than i have to give it.
for now Im sticking with chewing gum, rubber bands, FCP 4.5HD and an equally old version of after effects.
incidentally, Im extremely hesitant to say this but …I think i finally have it worked out.
I tried Mpeg exporter and that was indeed a handy program. however it lacked control over the *pixels*. Also tried FCP, compressor, quicktime, and I finally went back to After effects and discovered a plethora of options for pixels.
… and believe me it makes a difference…Pixel choice changed the actual *shape* of the frame (longer vs shorter), thereby compressing the image (horizontally) and causing angular things to compress and not match up properly.
In after effects, I clicked the box for D1 instead of the native *square pixels* and voila.
some angular things still have occasional blocky edges *within* FCP … but sharpen up nicely to their *intended* look upon output.
(this may simply be FCP 4.5HD showing its age.)
fingers crossed.
-edggendron, ed
-
what settings do you change / aim for in compressor??
motion filters?
bitrate?
specifically, should I **lower** the bitrate?also, does conversion take you forever?
thank you
-edwin gendrongendron, ed