Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 2
  • ok, thanks.

    edwin gendron

  • how about using a fast modern (borrowed) computer to convert to prores then to Apple intermediate codec then using *that* to edit with?

    edwin gendron

  • have succesfully made a DVD w short clips of canon footage and matched to dv footage.
    workflow is extremely slow though.

    edwin gendron

  • not my camera.
    It *is* my footage.
    can you advise?

    edwin gendron

  • running:
    G5 powerPC 1.6G ram
    FCP 4.5 hd (old timer)
    QT v7.6.4.

    I *have* to avoid buying “stuff”.
    I *do* have to make this work somehow.
    -edg

    edwin gendron

  • oh man,
    I dont have prores. and compressor wants to take 10 hrs (no kidding) to do a ten minute clip.

    any other ideas?
    thank you
    -edg

    edwin gendron

  • Edwin Gendron

    September 28, 2009 at 5:58 pm in reply to: canon 5d markII and h.264 problems

    what codec were you using?
    just h.264?
    or Prores?
    or apple intermediate codec?
    if H.264, perhaps it was due to the high compresssion?
    edwin gendron

    edwin gendron

  • Edwin Gendron

    September 27, 2009 at 8:06 pm in reply to: canon 5d markII and h.264 problems

    well, im afraid compressor works well but takes longer than i have to give it.

    for now Im sticking with chewing gum, rubber bands, FCP 4.5HD and an equally old version of after effects.
    incidentally, Im extremely hesitant to say this but …I think i finally have it worked out.
    I tried Mpeg exporter and that was indeed a handy program. however it lacked control over the *pixels*. Also tried FCP, compressor, quicktime, and I finally went back to After effects and discovered a plethora of options for pixels.
    … and believe me it makes a difference…

    Pixel choice changed the actual *shape* of the frame (longer vs shorter), thereby compressing the image (horizontally) and causing angular things to compress and not match up properly.

    In after effects, I clicked the box for D1 instead of the native *square pixels* and voila.
    some angular things still have occasional blocky edges *within* FCP … but sharpen up nicely to their *intended* look upon output.
    (this may simply be FCP 4.5HD showing its age.)
    fingers crossed.

    gendron, ed

  • Edwin Gendron

    September 27, 2009 at 8:04 pm in reply to: Ugly H.264 export ??

    well, im afraid compressor works well but takes longer than i have to give it.

    for now Im sticking with chewing gum, rubber bands, FCP 4.5HD and an equally old version of after effects.
    incidentally, Im extremely hesitant to say this but …I think i finally have it worked out.
    I tried Mpeg exporter and that was indeed a handy program. however it lacked control over the *pixels*. Also tried FCP, compressor, quicktime, and I finally went back to After effects and discovered a plethora of options for pixels.
    … and believe me it makes a difference…

    Pixel choice changed the actual *shape* of the frame (longer vs shorter), thereby compressing the image (horizontally) and causing angular things to compress and not match up properly.

    In after effects, I clicked the box for D1 instead of the native *square pixels* and voila.
    some angular things still have occasional blocky edges *within* FCP … but sharpen up nicely to their *intended* look upon output.
    (this may simply be FCP 4.5HD showing its age.)
    fingers crossed.
    -edg

    gendron, ed

  • Edwin Gendron

    September 27, 2009 at 2:43 pm in reply to: Ugly H.264 export ??

    what settings do you change / aim for in compressor??
    motion filters?
    bitrate?
    specifically, should I **lower** the bitrate?

    also, does conversion take you forever?
    thank you
    -edwin gendron

    gendron, ed

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy