Dotan Stern
Forum Replies Created
-
Thanx man that works great
are you going to work on in and make it with buttons that is easier to use?
if not is there another expression that works this way but one with a palette that i can use when i need it and not run the script every time i wanna use it
thanx again -
-
Thanx for the post pete but its easyer for me just to click the show/hide mask button then to run a script
i asked if i can assign a shortcut to this button that already work on AE
is it possible? -
Why using random(0,10) wont work in this situation?
-
[Dave LaRonde] “To get the change in 3D perspective you want, you COULD build a filing cabinet in a 3D Precomp, and fill it with 3D file drawers, also built in 3D precomps.
Personally, I wouldn’t want to try it, but you COULD do it.”
Thats what i did
i tought there was a better way
and peronally i would have done it in a 3D package but it takes longer to model and animate 🙂
thanx -
Anyone have an answer on how to poistion the layer back to its default after it was moved by a null with tracking?
-
Ok sorry ill try to explain better
what im doing is the effect of a sky surfer jumping and i have a video of him jumping
the camera is not fixed so i tracked it and applied to a null
i then use freeze frames of the jumper and linked to the null
i used time remapping to freeze the frame
so before the video ends i want the freeze frame to continue the motion of the video
but the video is now offset to the right cause of the tracking
so what i did was animation the position of the freeze frame
and thats work good
im asking if there is a way to do it quicker then finding the right position points -
Thanx kevin it works great
except in a square pixel comp
also whay i meant that sometimes there is a gap is when you play a little with the size there is a little gap a pixel or less between them you can see it if you toggle the transpareny grid and then you see a small line
dont know why is that
thanx again for the help
Dotan -
Thanx kevin its works
can you explain why you devide by 200 and them multiply again?
also i see on your expression and mine that if i use two squares it looks like they are snapped at the sides but i think one is overlapping the other they dont really snap at the sides
how is that? on both of the expression we use the other layer width
is there sometthing to do if the comp is square pixels or 1.07?
on one comp they look ok
on a different they ovelap
and on a third there is a little gap if you move them -
I figured something simple that works on an image if i haven’t scaled it and its
thisComp.layer(index-1).transform.position+width
but how can i keep this working even when i scale the layer?