Forum Replies Created

Page 20 of 22
  • Dmitry Kitsov

    March 7, 2012 at 7:58 am in reply to: Proxies Workflow Question

    This has been discussed before. Please search forum before posting.
    Short answer proxies are for DPX etc.

  • Dmitry Kitsov

    February 28, 2012 at 7:36 pm in reply to: How to playback slower then x1 or fast-forward at x2

    Use “comma” and “period” on your keyboard

  • Dmitry Kitsov

    February 8, 2012 at 6:34 pm in reply to: New Beta out Today?

    Thank you, Vladimir

  • Dmitry Kitsov

    February 8, 2012 at 6:33 pm in reply to: New Beta out Today?

    Thank you, Adam.

  • Dmitry Kitsov

    February 8, 2012 at 6:23 am in reply to: New Beta out Today?

    Vladimir, could please post your ProRes render fps and your system specs, please?

  • Dmitry Kitsov

    February 7, 2012 at 3:40 am in reply to: issue defocusing background

    are we talking about photoshop or davinci? if davinci then just use secondaries on background layer to make your object the same color as the background. LImit by a window if needed.

  • Dmitry Kitsov

    February 7, 2012 at 3:38 am in reply to: issue defocusing background

    WHat you have to do is on the background layer use the same selection you used to create a cutout of the flower and then modify the selection (Selection>Modify>Expand) to grow it so it nows includes some of the green around the flower. Then go to Edit>Content aware fill. If not available just use the clone tool (but in this case do not expand more than 2 pixels) and clone the outside of the object onto the inside (you are using the selection so you will only affect the area where the object was. Basic idea is that you want to erase a whole that would be left by your object. This way when you apply blur to your background (don’t forget to deselect when done) there is no object pixels to “bleed out” from underneath the top layer

  • Dmitry Kitsov

    February 7, 2012 at 3:19 am in reply to: Expected rendering performance.

    Lauri,
    When I use ProRes 1080p4444 as a source and ProRes as an output for a simple grade I get 7, 7.5 fps. While rendering CPU utilization is about 10% percent with the peaks of 25%.
    GPUs (image) utilized 2% to 4% each.
    I was rendering from a 4-disk RAID-0 external (160MBps) to a 4-disk RAID-0 internal (450 MBps) which is well below the needed bandwidth for the ProRes files.
    So it makes me think that perhaps ProRes implementation they have is not multithreaded. Sigh.

  • Dmitry Kitsov

    February 6, 2012 at 4:36 am in reply to: Expected rendering performance.

    Guys and girls, I would like it if you were not to stray of the original topic.
    I would simply like it if people would share the speed that they are able to render for output (not just grading preview) ProRes in DaVinci Resolve 8.2 Windows Beta 3 as well as the hardware setup they are running.
    Thank you.

  • Dmitry Kitsov

    February 6, 2012 at 1:40 am in reply to: Expected rendering performance.

    Well, this is my problem exactly. I wish I could get out realime ProRes render, but on me Windows 7 workstation I only get 7 fps when rendering ProRes with just a simple primary grade (no blooms or blurs or NR) on a very powerful system (24Gb, Xeon 5690 with 12 cores, 3GPUs – 1 GTX285 and 2x GTX 580) This is the same speed I get rendering out the same clip in ProRes on a 2009 Dual Core 15-inch MacBook pro.
    Is this a beta bug (v3), you think?
    I hope someone running a Windows beta could verify this for me. So I can see if it is a problem on my side or problem with a beta release in general.
    When rendering 10-bit DNxHD mxf I get 20fps, when rendering 10bit Cineform I get 24 fps.

Page 20 of 22

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy