Nicely said Bill.
Simply put, in my opinion, good lighting should tell, or enhance, a “story”, not detract from it.
When lighting is bad I think it’s obvious, and doesn’t need to be pointed out.
The bigger issue is whether or not the lighting is successful. That would make for a more interesing discussion.
I propose this as an example. There are two major events occuring in the US right now that are consuming an incredible amount of broadcasting time by every Network, cable company, and small affiliate — the Republican and Democratic National Conventions.
Both conventions are lit by highly talented professionals, doing their best to provide good (make that great)lighting, not only as public events, but as major broadcasting productions.
The question at hand is not whether the lighting is goood or bad, but if the lighting is successful, especially considering the differences of their individual “stories”.
DS