David Rennie
Forum Replies Created
-
Better yet, just buy the band… they can then perform live for you anytime you want. Then you not only get “high resolution” but also 3-D without the funny glasses…..
-
I use the shot watcher by vortex media. Though in my case it is a “one-way” flow. I do not have a second shot watcher for the B cam. I use a wireless communiction however to coordinate camera movements between the two shots. I find that in most cases this works very well.
-
David Rennie
August 11, 2005 at 2:04 pm in reply to: Online Guide to FCP–>DVDSP Workflow using Anamorphic adapter?wish I could help…. but I don’t believe in using fruit to edit…. just kidding. Normally I wouldn’t joke like that but you seem to have a great sense of humor.
Seriously I just got the anamorphic lens (well it on its way) once I have had a chance to play with it I will share my work flow. Though I am on a PC I suspect that the work flow will matchup to one degree or another. I have some buddies that use mac’s and have found this theory to be true with other issues.
-
I am curious, why wouldn’t you manually WB? Do adjust in post? if so why not cpature it that way to begin with?
I tend to push my whites to make things look a little warmer. I simply prefer the look.
-
I white balance each time the color temp changes providing the situation allows for it. Let me also state though that my camera holds 3 settings. Two manual setting and a preset at 3.2k. So if I know in advnce the various conditions I will be in I can set these in advance. Otherwise I will stop when appropriate and WB. I purchased the Warm Cards from vortex media (BH carries them too) and keep one of the small cards in my shirt pocket at all times. This makes WB a snap taking only seconds and will save me a ton of time in post.
-
Sounds like you are not recording with the lav mic, but with the built in mic. This could also explain why your audio sounds so bad. If I am right you need to go into the menu and make sure it is set to the external mic.
-
That may be true, but from a pratical standpoint the DVC-60 is not well suited for low light conditions. It would not be my camera of choice for covering events such as a wedding reception. I have a DVC-15 (which was replaced by the DVC-60). Both cameras are 4 lux cameras. It requires way more light than my DVX-100. For the amount of money you are talking about you could get a vx-2100 which is much better suited to covering receptions.
-
Do you mean the AGDVC-60 by Panasonic? I am not familar with a JVC camera by that name.
If you do mean the Panasonic camera you should know that it is not that “big” of a camera weighing in under 6 pounds. I would also suggest looking at reviews of the camera. The DVC-60 is much like the DVC-15 (discontinued) or the DVC-7 (single chipper) in that low light performance may be an issue for you.
-
I have no complaints with the quality. Granted it is not going to be “completely pristine”, but my results have been equal to a mid range wireless or a MD recorder.
-
With an iRiver you do not need to record agin the audio. It comes with some pretty decent software that makes the process no more complicated than a drag and drop. I can convert an hour of audio to wav in about 30-40 seconds.