Activity › Forums › Event Videographers › manual white balance?
-
manual white balance?
Posted by Pat Kingery on August 6, 2005 at 3:28 pmI almost always use the WB presets. How do you do a manual WB when you are in a location lit by different types of light and you are panning/moving the camera around the room?
Andrei F. replied 20 years, 8 months ago 8 Members · 11 Replies -
11 Replies
-
Velma
August 6, 2005 at 5:45 pmThat’s tough. If I’m continually going back and forth between different lightings, I just white balance for the lighting where I’ll be most of the time…where most of the important people are. And then I leave it and correct it in editing. To me, that’s a whole lot easier than stopping to white balance every few minutes.
velma
-
Mark Suszko
August 6, 2005 at 7:39 pmThis is a situation made for Auto-trace white. Some cameras implement it better than others, being more “shockless” about the changes.
-
David Rennie
August 7, 2005 at 3:38 pmI white balance each time the color temp changes providing the situation allows for it. Let me also state though that my camera holds 3 settings. Two manual setting and a preset at 3.2k. So if I know in advnce the various conditions I will be in I can set these in advance. Otherwise I will stop when appropriate and WB. I purchased the Warm Cards from vortex media (BH carries them too) and keep one of the small cards in my shirt pocket at all times. This makes WB a snap taking only seconds and will save me a ton of time in post.
-
Peter Ralph
August 9, 2005 at 3:02 pmadd me to the presets only camp, I never use auto white balance, and manual very rarely.
-
David Rennie
August 9, 2005 at 3:39 pmI am curious, why wouldn’t you manually WB? Do adjust in post? if so why not cpature it that way to begin with?
I tend to push my whites to make things look a little warmer. I simply prefer the look.
-
Doug Graham
August 9, 2005 at 5:39 pmI’m t’other way ’round. I use either manual or auto, but not the presets.
Regards,
Doug Graham -
Peter Ralph
August 10, 2005 at 2:21 pmyes I color grade everything in post, if you don’t I can see that warm cards might be useful, but except in cases like that where you want to change the image, match cameras, or compensate for a discontinuous light spectrum, my recommendation is stick with the presets.
This matter has been discussed extensively over the years on the cinematography and lighting forums, here is a link to a post from Leo Tichelli:
https://forums.creativecow.net/cgi-bin/new_read_post.cgi?forumid=47&postid=68479&archive=T
Posts from Leo, John Sharaf (DP for 60 minutes) and many others put a strong case case for sticking with the presets.
-
Colvin Eccleston
August 12, 2005 at 3:46 pmI manual balance for each room or setting if I get the chance. In mixed light, I try to get a good compromise. I do still post the colour but I am trying to get it all done in the shoot so I can cut down editing time and get it into the customer’s hands quicker. By avoiding filters I can get my weddings posted out in a week.
-
Pat Kingery
August 13, 2005 at 2:16 amWhat do you think of the Peter’s argument that manual white balancing blands everything to high noon in Kansas?
-
Peter Ralph
August 14, 2005 at 2:03 pmThat is Leo Tichelli’s view not mine. For wedding work I think presets are often a good choice, but I know a lot of shooters who get great results using manual and auto WB.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up