Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Event Videographers manual white balance?

  • manual white balance?

    Posted by Pat Kingery on August 6, 2005 at 3:28 pm

    I almost always use the WB presets. How do you do a manual WB when you are in a location lit by different types of light and you are panning/moving the camera around the room?

    Andrei F. replied 20 years, 8 months ago 8 Members · 11 Replies
  • 11 Replies
  • Velma

    August 6, 2005 at 5:45 pm

    That’s tough. If I’m continually going back and forth between different lightings, I just white balance for the lighting where I’ll be most of the time…where most of the important people are. And then I leave it and correct it in editing. To me, that’s a whole lot easier than stopping to white balance every few minutes.

    velma

  • Mark Suszko

    August 6, 2005 at 7:39 pm

    This is a situation made for Auto-trace white. Some cameras implement it better than others, being more “shockless” about the changes.

  • David Rennie

    August 7, 2005 at 3:38 pm

    I white balance each time the color temp changes providing the situation allows for it. Let me also state though that my camera holds 3 settings. Two manual setting and a preset at 3.2k. So if I know in advnce the various conditions I will be in I can set these in advance. Otherwise I will stop when appropriate and WB. I purchased the Warm Cards from vortex media (BH carries them too) and keep one of the small cards in my shirt pocket at all times. This makes WB a snap taking only seconds and will save me a ton of time in post.

  • Peter Ralph

    August 9, 2005 at 3:02 pm

    add me to the presets only camp, I never use auto white balance, and manual very rarely.

  • David Rennie

    August 9, 2005 at 3:39 pm

    I am curious, why wouldn’t you manually WB? Do adjust in post? if so why not cpature it that way to begin with?

    I tend to push my whites to make things look a little warmer. I simply prefer the look.

  • Doug Graham

    August 9, 2005 at 5:39 pm

    I’m t’other way ’round. I use either manual or auto, but not the presets.

    Regards,
    Doug Graham

  • Peter Ralph

    August 10, 2005 at 2:21 pm

    yes I color grade everything in post, if you don’t I can see that warm cards might be useful, but except in cases like that where you want to change the image, match cameras, or compensate for a discontinuous light spectrum, my recommendation is stick with the presets.

    This matter has been discussed extensively over the years on the cinematography and lighting forums, here is a link to a post from Leo Tichelli:

    https://forums.creativecow.net/cgi-bin/new_read_post.cgi?forumid=47&postid=68479&archive=T

    Posts from Leo, John Sharaf (DP for 60 minutes) and many others put a strong case case for sticking with the presets.

  • Colvin Eccleston

    August 12, 2005 at 3:46 pm

    I manual balance for each room or setting if I get the chance. In mixed light, I try to get a good compromise. I do still post the colour but I am trying to get it all done in the shoot so I can cut down editing time and get it into the customer’s hands quicker. By avoiding filters I can get my weddings posted out in a week.

  • Pat Kingery

    August 13, 2005 at 2:16 am

    What do you think of the Peter’s argument that manual white balancing blands everything to high noon in Kansas?

  • Peter Ralph

    August 14, 2005 at 2:03 pm

    That is Leo Tichelli’s view not mine. For wedding work I think presets are often a good choice, but I know a lot of shooters who get great results using manual and auto WB.

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy