Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 2
  • For those following, looks like my fears are confirmed in this thread: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/2482907

    There’s very much an issue with the current version of AME when it relates to batches/ proxies but Adobe knows about it and hopefully they’ll get an update/ fix out shortly!

    David Parke
    Editor
    http://www.dparke.com

  • UPDATE: I ran Preference Manager and trashed all adobe preferences on one of the 5 systems and I am 10 minutes into a queue of a couple hundred clips. These are different clips than I was encoding previously but this batch was having the same UI issues. Will let these go overnight and see what I come in to tomorrow morning.

    David Parke
    Editor
    http://www.dparke.com

  • EDIT: To make matters stranger, when I command-tab into other apps, the progress bar seems to advance in the app icon – one of my favorite adobe features. Still super slow but it does seem to be more responsive than the app UI. The output file was still complete, though. It’s a whole thing that’s not making much sense to me. UI frozen, app icon slow, actual computing process works but is slow to start the next file. Am I the only one having this issue? That it’s on several systems across several OS versions seems strange.

    David Parke
    Editor
    http://www.dparke.com

  • Thanks Laura and Mike.

    Yeah, I saw your post, Laura, and hoped that this would be a slightly different issue since I am using AME to process proxies of my raw media. I don’t even have an edit yet! haha.

    Mike – I haven’t had an issue sending to AME, it’ll launch and populate just fine – I can even drag media into it to manually create my proxies. It’s what happens 5 minutes in that really gets me. The UI just freezes. The processes continue in the BG though, although very slowly. I can monitor the destination folder and the files are created without issue. It’s just the UI that takes a dump and I just don’t know why.

    Bummer.

    David Parke
    Editor
    http://www.dparke.com

  • David Parke

    September 13, 2017 at 9:42 pm in reply to: Batch rename clip name, not file name?

    This did exactly what I wanted when I wanted to apply tape names to my footage by bin name. Thank you!

    David Parke
    Editor
    http://www.dparke.com

  • Sorry, maybe I wasn’t clear. I don’t mind losing this transition all together. Not necessary for this project. I just don’t wanna see the dialog box every time I open it. Is installing this plugin pack the easiest way to do this? I wish there were a way to suppress it like “offline all” for missing media.

    David Parke
    Editor
    http://www.dparke.com

  • I was actually in that thread but got the dreaded “too many redirects” message from safari and chrome when I logged in to comment. There was an update released today that I am eager to test when I get back. Let me know if you install it and that fixes it. The offline everything and open and relink method sounds unnecessarily tedious, i don’t care how quickly it goes. I’ll keep and eye out here and on the adobe site (signed out seems to work for me to at least follow up.)

    David Parke
    Editor
    http://www.dparke.com

  • David Parke

    February 1, 2016 at 11:57 pm in reply to: Avid 7 to AE: 1080p offline/ 4k online workflow

    It’s Sony f55 footage, not RED. Sorry I didn’t make that clear.

    David Parke
    Editor
    http://www.dparke.com

  • David Parke

    February 1, 2016 at 6:33 pm in reply to: Avid 7 to AE: 1080p offline/ 4k online workflow

    Thanks. I’ll be exploring this today. I was able to patch something together to make this work in that I got them to break and let me use AMA, AMA’d in the 4k clips, transcoded to PR422HQ in Avid, cut a sequence from the PR422HQ files, relinked to AMA, exported an AAF, Pro Imported to After Effects and was JUST ABOUT there. My comp size was wrong, my pixel aspect ratio was off, and something else I can’t remember right now but overall I technically got it working.

    I am going to install 8 onto a second partition and test the workflow that way to see how that goes. I wonder if their shared storage can handle DNxHR files? We shall see and I’ll report back.

    Thanks!

    David Parke
    Editor
    http://www.dparke.com

  • David Parke

    December 15, 2014 at 5:49 pm in reply to: FCP 10.1.x Stuck in Proxy mode?

    That worked this time. Who knows?! I’ll report back if it goes all wonky again! Thanks.

    David Parke
    Editor
    http://www.dparke.com

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy