[Jeremy Garchow] “FCPX could be better. We all know this. It’s OK to criticize it, I am still going to use it everyday, it’s still my favorite NLE to use, and I hope it gets better.
There is no reason to have audio follow video on a dissolve by default. Maybe it can be an option, but not a default.”
My thoughts exactly. This is just a guess, but perhaps there is a large number of people who feel that an audio fade should be included with any transition, as it is now, that is not a cut. I can understand this viewpoint, to a reasonable extent, for more efficient editing. On the other hand, this is not the best approach.
I always prefer to have video and audio transitions as separate rather than combined. Look at Avid or Premiere Pro, they don’t slap on a audio cross dissolve when adding a video transition. Earlier versions of FCP was the same way. They kept the two separate like it should have been from the beginning.
While expanding audio and video is the only method that “works” now, I find it annoying to do an extra step.
Perhaps it is the overall design concept of the magnetic timeline or Apple listening to people who are consumers not experienced editors or exposed to editing as we see it, not trying to belittle anyone here. Feel free to disagree. It just seems as Final Cut Pro X was made to be professional but made for consumers. Nothing wrong with that approach but there is room for improvement.