Forum Replies Created

Page 2 of 2
  • Darren Edwards

    December 18, 2009 at 8:33 pm in reply to: Super 8 cine film

    I didn’t mean any disrespect to Mike, of course – if he’s experienced positive results by applying Auto Levels to film captured via HDV camera, then go for it. However, my one and only time using it was applying it to music promo performance shot on a beach in Barcelona; the light remained the same throughout and its director wanted a crunched/saturated look, and Auto Levels seemingly did the trick, quickly. It was applied to all the live stuff, we awaited render and found it a waste of time. Whenever tentatively applied at a later date on other types of footage, the result was the same: flickery, unuseable garbage.

    D.

  • Darren Edwards

    December 18, 2009 at 11:13 am in reply to: Super 8 cine film

    Never use Auto Levels for anything! It’s a horrible, horribly
    unintelligent filter which hasn’t a clue what it’s doing
    and will result in flickery footage. Very serious about this.

    Darren.

    youtube.com/darrenpce

  • Darren Edwards

    December 18, 2009 at 11:11 am in reply to: Super 8 cine film

    Ah, okay. That’s not an uncommon practice. There’s
    currently a big furor about the ‘WWII in HD’ doco series
    because they up-rez’d a lot of library film by pointing
    a Red One at a wall…
    https://provideocoalition.com/index.php/shullfish/story/controversial_history_channel_wwii_in_hd_debate_the_truth/

    Colour grading in Prem can be equally as sophisticated
    as anything else out there.

    If the footage is a bit murky, the first thing I’ll adjust
    is pedestal. This raises the overall brightness/gamma
    levels in a sympathetic manner whilst (hopefully) revealing
    hidden details in the black areas. And vice versa if lowered.

    Curves will crunch your levels whilst also increasing contrast.
    Almost every tutorial here — or at places like
    https://www.videocopilot.net/tutorials/ — will have something
    to say about curves adjustment, and how to do it. Go easy.

    There’s a fantastic old-school method of sharpening imagery
    in Photoshop, which up until CS3, was impossible to do with
    video footage, but now that CS3+ versions of Photoshop support
    video import, one can use the Photoshop filters on it.

    *It derives from the days when Quark users wanted a way of
    shrinking images whilst maintaining sharpness…

    Import the video, duplicate the video layer, apply Filter/Other/High Pass
    and select a Radius setting of around 0.5 (the higher the figure the
    sharper the effect). After which layer blend the effected top
    layer with Hard Light. Works great on still images, of course,
    but for video footage in Photoshop you will need to do this
    frame by frame. Prem’s sharpening filters are a bit clunky,
    a bit low bit-rate, for me — but, any port in a storm.

    To really go to work on your Super8 stuff, grab a copy of
    Magic Bullet’s latest Looks suite plugin for Premiere. The user
    interface is a joy to use.
    https://www.redgiantsoftware.com/products/all/magic-bullet-looks/

    Alternatively, you can have my Super8 projector.

    Hope that helps.
    Cheers,
    Darren.

    youtube.com/darrenpce

  • Darren Edwards

    December 17, 2009 at 7:33 pm in reply to: Super 8 cine film

    How did you telecine the Super8 stock with Nero in the first instance?

    D.

  • Darren Edwards

    December 17, 2009 at 4:08 pm in reply to: Adobe Premiere Pro error compiling movie message

    With older versions of PPro — i.e. ver 1.5 which most of still use
    for SD work — I’ve found that any project which uses a lot of
    differing audio khz on the timeline will eventually do a crash
    on export, even when the audio has been mixed down to one 48khz file.

    D.

    youtube.com/darrenpce

  • Darren Edwards

    December 17, 2009 at 4:05 pm in reply to: Super 8 cine film

    Super8 is the latest codec to be supported? 😉

    Seriously speaking, what’s so bad about the original rushes?

    Darren.

    youtube.com/darrenpce

  • Darren Edwards

    October 29, 2009 at 2:56 pm in reply to: PAL/NTSC Problem

    Jon’s right, software is terribly slow doing pull up/pull down of
    frame rates/formats, but it can do it, at least. There’s even a
    couple of hintful Cow tutorials scattered around here on pull up/down
    in software like AE.

    Darren.

    youtube.com/darrenpce

  • I’ve onlined and submitted a few videos to MTV UK.
    I’ve always mastered TV audio to the traditional
    -1.5db (and film at -6) and they’ve never complained,
    although Sky usually dislike audio too loud.

    HD to digibeta is as mentioned before — sending a HD
    digital file (or tape) to an NLE and downconverting/
    burning to digibeta in one go.

    For a music promo I’ve never paid more than £50 for
    the [insert format here] to digibeta process, the
    time, plus the cost of the 5′ digibeta tape itself.
    Then again, I’m based in the north of England and
    not London.

    D.

    youtube.com/darrenpce

  • Darren Edwards

    September 23, 2009 at 4:11 pm in reply to: Cameras other then MINI DV

    Hi Chris,

    The popular choice of solid state SD/HDV for UK HE at the moment is
    Sony’s new range of medium-priced ‘Z’ cams.

    https://www.sony.co.uk/biz/view/ShowProductCategory.action?site=biz_en_GB&category=HDVCamcorders

    The solid state unit records to either AVI or RAW DV. Record
    to it in either DV, DVCAM or HDV mode. When attached to a PC
    it behaves as a harddrive and you simply drag the AVIs over.

    You can record to tape (as a back up) whilst recording to
    to solid state simultaneously.

    S270E/Z7 range also accepts cheap non-Sony memory cards.

    We’ve been using the shoulder mounted S270E and Z7E for a while —
    sports, broadcast, educational etc. — and…they’ve never let
    us down — and they are the perfect option for you really —
    but given our choice again, I would have saved our (low-end)
    budget for a little while longer.

    I won’t bother listing my quibbles, but several options are:

    Panasonic AG range: supported by Prem CS, P2 cards expensive.
    https://www.panasonic.com/business/provideo/p2-hd/index.asp

    HD XDCAM: records to reasonably-priced harddiscs, supported by
    Prem CS, but probably overkill for everyday student use. The
    new F800 is lovely, though, for the price.
    https://www.sony.co.uk/biz/view/ShowProduct.action?product=PDW-F800&site=biz_en_GB&pageType=Overview&imageType=Main&category=XDCAMCamcorders

    JVC GY range: medium priced cameras — we used these (and
    the Z7s) for an entire season of super league rugby. Older
    models only recorded a SD or 720p HDV image to small miniDV/HDV
    tapes, newer models support a harddrive which fits on the
    back. They’re funny to look at when fully kitted up — they
    look like bazookas — but saying that, they use CCD chips as
    opposed to the Z7s’ CMOS, and frankly, I still prefer CCD
    regardless of Sony’s dabbling with CMOS technology. The
    harddrive records to XDCAM format supported by Prem CS.
    https://pro.jvc.com/prof/attributes/features.jsp?model_id=MDL101824

    Suggest using the HDV forum for specifics.

    Cheers,
    Darren.

    Super League, S270E and JVC GY

    youtube.com/darrenpce

Page 2 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy