Forum Replies Created

Page 69 of 215
  • Daniel Low

    August 7, 2009 at 10:45 pm in reply to: Changing FPS in Quicktime

    The only way to speed it up is to use a time re-mapper.

    You can’t just change the number of frames per second and expect it to speed up or slow down.

    Do you have Final Cut Pro?

    __________________________________________________________________
    “There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”

    Steve Ballmer To USA Today

  • Digibeta is great but it does not come close to whatever they used for BadBays (probably film shot at 24 progressive frames)

    Any desktop compression application; compressor, episode or procoder for example, are some way off the capabilities of what the hollywood production studios use if used as a normal person would.

    You are some way off the compressionists that drive these systems.

    Interlacing is a nasty evil monster that should have died already but we’ll have to live with it for some time yet.

    __________________________________________________________________
    “There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”

    Steve Ballmer To USA Today

  • Daniel Low

    August 7, 2009 at 5:50 pm in reply to: soronsen squeeze jumpy in random places

    [will nangle] “Im using soronsen because i heard the compression was really good and been looking for something that produces a nice quality vide”

    Sorenson is pretty ancient.

    Try H.264 in either a mov or .mp4. Depending on what the content of your video is there should be no need to go over 5000kb/s. Start at 100kb/s and work your way up.

    (use AAC for your audio if you have any)

    __________________________________________________________________
    “There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”

    Steve Ballmer To USA Today

  • Daniel Low

    August 7, 2009 at 5:01 pm in reply to: soronsen squeeze jumpy in random places

    Ok, we’re getting there. 10,000kbps is way too high for Sorenson – and actually Sorenson is not suitable for HD frame sizes.

    Any reason why you are using Sorenson?

    What Mac are you trying to play it back on?

    __________________________________________________________________
    “There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”

    Steve Ballmer To USA Today

  • Daniel Low

    August 7, 2009 at 4:12 pm in reply to: soronsen squeeze jumpy in random places

    Ok, what settings did you use in Squeeze for your mov?

    __________________________________________________________________
    “There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”

    Steve Ballmer To USA Today

  • Daniel Low

    August 7, 2009 at 3:57 pm in reply to: 60fps to 25fps for SD DVD PAL

    Just send the client the NTSC DVDs. 99.9% of dvd players sold in PAL land for several years will play NTSC perfectly happily.

    __________________________________________________________________
    “There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”

    Steve Ballmer To USA Today

  • Daniel Low

    August 7, 2009 at 3:55 pm in reply to: soronsen squeeze jumpy in random places

    [will nangle] “HDV-.MOV in final cut express and .mov-.mov”

    What Quicktime codec(s) did you use in your mov’s and what settings did you use for those codecs?

    __________________________________________________________________
    “There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”

    Steve Ballmer To USA Today

  • Daniel Low

    August 7, 2009 at 11:05 am in reply to: soronsen squeeze jumpy in random places

    https://forums.creativecow.net/readpost/20/862073

    __________________________________________________________________
    “There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”

    Steve Ballmer To USA Today

  • There’s a huge difference in the quality of video processing available in todays DVD players and flat panel displays.

    It’s used to be the case that you need to spend huge amounts of money to properly process (Deinterlace, scale and cadance) video to get it to look good on an HD panel but that is no longer the case anymore.

    One of the best value processors around can be found in the very low cost (£100) Toshiba XDE500 DVD players.

    Others processors to look for include https://www.hqv.com/

    IMO these are far better than mainstream software tools, but I’d like to be proved wrong.

    __________________________________________________________________
    “There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”

    Steve Ballmer To USA Today

  • Daniel Low

    August 5, 2009 at 10:59 pm in reply to: Deinterlacing: Compressor vs FieldsKit

    I’ve not done a side-by-side but looking at the methods that fieldskit offers I don’t think it could better compressor, nor Episode.

    __________________________________________________________________
    “There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”

    Steve Ballmer To USA Today

Page 69 of 215

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy