Daniel Low
Forum Replies Created
-
I’m not too clear on what you are trying to achieve (what do you want to deliver to the client, exactly?) but never the less I think this question is better posted in the Final Cut Pro Forum?
If you have a specific compressor, H.264 or encoding/compression question then we are here to help.
__________________________________________________________________
“There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”Steve Ballmer To USA Today
-
Daniel Low
September 16, 2009 at 2:13 pm in reply to: Can I put an FCP video file and an ac3 audio file through Compressor to get a combined result?I can;t get access to it till later. While you’re waiting have a try with the muxing tools in FFMPEGx:
__________________________________________________________________
“There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”Steve Ballmer To USA Today
-
Craig is right and YouTube recommend that you do not alter the frame rate of your source material. Going from 30 to 24 may give you more bits per frame but you are also ditching 6 frames per second, unless you employ the best of standards coverters.
__________________________________________________________________
“There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”Steve Ballmer To USA Today
-
Daniel Low
September 15, 2009 at 11:53 pm in reply to: Can I put an FCP video file and an ac3 audio file through Compressor to get a combined result?Have a try with MPEGStream clip from Squared5. It should mux the two files IIRC.
__________________________________________________________________
“There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”Steve Ballmer To USA Today
-
I find it odd that you don’t support 16:9 in this day and age, but I find it more odd that the dimensions that you suggest for video in your FAQ are wrong:
https://faq.fliqz.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Player_FAQ#What_are_the_default_dimensions.3F
The sizes maybe almost 4:3 but it’s pretty much common knowledge that frame sizes for Flash video should be equally divisible by 16 at best, or 8 next best, as outlined by Adobe here:
https://www.adobe.com/devnet/flash/apps/flv_bitrate_calculator/video_sizes.h...
?
__________________________________________________________________
“There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”Steve Ballmer To USA Today
-
[Ned Miller] “I am using Sorenson Squeeze 5 so you are advising I crop there to create 4×3 rather than FCP? Is that what you’re advising?”
Yes
[Ned Miller] “I would do a test but the Bears are on now”
Panda, polar or grizzly? 😉
__________________________________________________________________
“There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”Steve Ballmer To USA Today
-
You HAVE to get the video frame size changed. It’s just wrong. Really. Seriously. Just wrong. Tell the client it’ll look totally crap at that wrong size. If they refuse, then, if I were you, I’d walk away from the job..
In order to make 4:3 from 16:9, you need to crop the video, you are best to do this in your encoding application…what one are you using?
Why don’t you just set the camera to shoot 4:3 in the first place?
__________________________________________________________________
“There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”Steve Ballmer To USA Today
-
If the shoot is just for the website – then shoot at 30p – Progressive is better for anything but very fast moving content.
[Ned Miller] “Also, I will have to frame them for 4×3 because for some reason their web page developer wants 250×187. “
Tell your client they need a new web developer 250×187 is an ‘illegal’ frame size for video. He/she obviously doesn’t have a clue. You should be the one dictating frame sizes, not a page layout dweeb.
See here:
https://www.adobe.com/devnet/flash/apps/flv_bitrate_calculator/video_sizes.htmlAlso there’s no point in shooting at 1080, you might as well do it at 720 or in this case even 480 – unless you are using the content for something else.
It’s like using a Ferrari to pick up the shopping.
__________________________________________________________________
“There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”Steve Ballmer To USA Today
-
What format of video are you editing? It may well be that what you are seeing is the effects of colourspace conversion from the timeline of 4:x:x to the 4:4:4 of the PhotoJPEG codec.
__________________________________________________________________
“There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”Steve Ballmer To USA Today
-
[Chris Blair] “What’s weird is we can setup a transcode from HD to SD 720×480 16×9 aspect to Quicktime DV, Quicktime JPEG2000 and H264 and the first two play back 16×9, but the H264 plays back full 4×3 and stretched.
So what exactly causes this? Is it the square pixel versus rectangular issue among the codecs? “
Yes. DV is a non-square pixel format. H.264 can be either square or non-square, JPEG2000 is square.
As such a 720×480 frame can contain either 4×3 or 16×9 content – the pixel aspect ratio controls that.
__________________________________________________________________
“There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”Steve Ballmer To USA Today