Contrarian?
[john sharaf] “Like I said, if you’re viewing on a monitor without 3:2 pulldown added, then the motion is not accurate and it might studder, jutter or whatever you describe as unpleasant.”
23.98p without pull down on a monitor that can play 23.98p . . . looks like 23.98p.
Computer monitor have no problem with 23.98p native. Many HDTVs can play 23.98p (and some really do a bad job of it).
Many editors don’t understand the concept behind the cadence (both “standard” and advanced) when pull down is added and that can certainly impact the look if one is editing 23.98 with pull down added in 29.97 time line.
It’s interesting that I’m not the only one who sees motion issues with 23.98 and video. I just viewed Doug Jensen’s EX1 training video and while he doesn’t verbalize it well, he does state clearly that he prefers 30p to 24p and shows examples of the same scene shot both ways. The scenes are displayed in standard def on a 29.97 TV set of course. I don’t recall if he mentioned the shutter angle (or speed) but nonetheless I’m sure he and many other very experienced DPs (which I don’t claim to be) see what I see.
In short, I can’t nail why but 24fps film with proper pull down played 29.97 interlace looks different that video 23.98 with pull down played on 29.97 interlace. My eyes see it and I do know I’m not the only one who does.
There are also many means to add that pull down and maybe that’s part of the difference. “Video” shot at 23.98 and played at 24fps in a movie theater is another story. MANY films are shooting with digital cameras at 23.98 and shown in theaters at 24fps and they look fine.