Two answers in one place for those trying to follow this.
Yes do try setting Quality to Zero.
I can understand the need for a large frame size for what the coaches need to see. See if you can drop it to 800kbps.
I am thinking that if you’re doing progressive download you might try Quicktime H.264. The coaches may like the frame by frame jog in the Quicktime player. As Charles points out H.264 will give you great quality at lower bit rates (and therefore smaller file sizes). This does mean being able to “push” QT7 and they’ll have to have fairly “fast” computers for the decode demands H.264 puts on the system.
If the coaches want this kind of size, detail, control they you should stress the importance of “pushing” H.264. They can’t be hung by IT departments who refuse to allow QT7 or and update to QT7 though. You would provide a big fat obvious link to QT7 download and make it clear they need it. It they may not be happy with the results using a 6 year old cheap Windows box either.
I’m wondering how you’re finding HDV and handling fast motion too. Frame by frame jog may not be worth it. I have this vision of a coach wanting to jog through frame by frame to see how the receive pulls in a bullet pass into the flats. If HDV makes the motion of the ball and the receiver’s hands blurry . . . The Quicktime controllor can make it easy for them to go back and review a play over again though on a progressive download.
Flip4Mac 2.0.x has added a “complexity” controll which can speed encode (at quality price though) although there’s an “issue” with 2 pass VBR. I believe they’re going to work on speeding the encode on the next release of export. Another “hook” I’d like to see is being able to use “distributive rendering” in Compressor.