Chris T
Forum Replies Created
-
Yeah, I just have a feeling that since FCP seems to struggle with image quality when scaling and rendering pretty basic DV effects, it may also have trouble with other plug-ins which create similar effects…
your example with the difference of quality of the mattes between FCP and AE is exactly the kind of thing i’m talking about. -
Yes, indeed there is the difference between those plug-ins which have their own user interface versus those that try and work inside the software packages ‘fx panel’, and that can really throw a plug-in functionality. However, i was also wondering (and i’m not sure if this is what you meant walter), does FCP, or AE have any influence in the way the plug-in’s effects are rendered on a piece of footage – assuming that we are rendering out to the same format, uncompressed avi or whatever in both FCP and AE?
-
good idea, send some feedback in. surprising that they don’t already have it…but i’m noticing that there are quite a few similar functions not there..’pro’ indeed…hmf. (and it sounds like the cantonese version is closer to the sort of sentiment i wish to express.)
-
oh…how unfortunate. hmf
thanks all the same. -
Ah yes, that’s what I suspected I would have to do. It’s a bit bizzarre though…
-
Hmm…Well, in an interesting turn of events, I am once again encountering this strange problem, and I’ve defintely got the Field Dominance set correctly for this sequence, so I am not sure why whenever I attempt to apply a Basic Motion effect I experience this ‘soft focus’ image degradation reprecussion. Dave you mentioned you had a similar issue, with a work around, could you perhaps expand on that? Or indeed if anyone else has noted this problem and found a solution please do help.
Cheers