Chris Harlan
Forum Replies Created
-
[TImothy Auld] “Happy to hear anyone’s story of their tools and how they work in their situation. But “FCPX, Learn it”?
Please.”A bit militant, yes. I’m also interested in some clarification over a show or production company at a network vs. the entire network. Situation one, I can easily understand; situation two would be quite a surprise.
Oh, what the heck:
Avid. Learn it.
I mean, Premiere Pro. Learn it.
-
[Jordan Mena] “I’m currently working for a major network that decided to go the FCPX route for creative and finishing in tandem with Resolve.”
Which major network? I’m not seeing that, but I’ve been busy, so I’m not seeing everything. None of the studios or networks I work for have made that decision. Most of them are either solidly Avid-based, or non-denominational. Maybe we disagree on the definition of a “major network?” I count seven broadcast majors–ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, Telemundo, Fox, and CW–plus a half-dozen very substantial Cable franchises like TBN that deserve to be called “Major,” however non-traditionally.
That one of these has now decided to adopt FCP X as its primary promotions NLE is certainly BIG news. So, please, inform us.
Or do I misunderstand? Do you mean a major network has allowed the show you are working on the go FCP X, as opposed to the Network going FCP X?
-
Chris Harlan
October 17, 2013 at 2:48 am in reply to: Speculating whether FCPX 10.1 be a paid update?[Marcus Moore] “I DO think there’ll be one available for under $4,000 which is what a topped out iMac runs. I’m more inclined to believe the entry level MacPro will be about $3,500, which is just a hair above the $3,449 price of a top ‘o the line rMBP.”
I think they have to have one there or it will die fairly quickly. Its not geared to take on the upper end of the workstation market, so it has to hit the center to lower end of that market with a little extra oomph. And its design and portability suggest that they know that. So yeah, I think somewhere between 3200 and 3800 for a quad-core, and 3800 and 4200 for a hexa-core. And then the whole thing probably goes up to about 15,000–18,000, fully built, but I don’t think they’ll sell a lot of those.
-
[Alex Gerulaitis] “(Sent from my phone on a motorcycle at 115Mph on 405.)
“Oh, that was you. I was trying to figure out who I blew past. How’s it going?! You guys still in the same space? Maybe some lunch some day?
-
[Marcus Moore] “What sort of track record do these guys have- is the question I would ask first.
“Up through FCP 7 they had an excellent track record, but after the release of X, not so much. Oh, wait. You mean the website. Never mind.
-
[Jeremy Garchow] “Then by using the powers of Internet Deduction, the new version of fcpx will be here on nov 13!
It’s settled!”
What’s even more amazing is this no longer new version of X will have a switch to turn both the new tracks and the new bins on and off so that everybody will be happy. In fact there is a setting that wil let them be both on and off at the same time. Amazing.
-
[Steve Connor] “and the source code will probably soon be open source 🙂
“LOL. Yeah, I got the notice last night along with everybody else.
-
[Aindreas Gallagher] “also – for anyone at all mograph shortform combo inclined coming from legend – its hard now to see any other edit system realistically.”
Yah. It’s pretty neat.
-
[Steve Connor] “Have you had a chance to play with CC yet?”
I’m using CC on a large, flashy Sizzle right now, and loving it. I’m still discovering lots of things new to me and am at gee-whiz phase. I’ve gotten to really like the window docking and tabbing, especially on multiple monitors. I love having separate mixers for clips and tracks. I still feel Avid is a slightly better cutter, but part of that might be me blundering in to CC and not approaching it in a more organized fashion. Avid also feels snappier in terms of playback control, but again, that might be an adjustment that I need to make somewhere, but haven’t yet. Overall, its quite good.
-
Chris Harlan
September 29, 2013 at 7:04 pm in reply to: How exactly has FCX improved or expedited your workflow?[David Powell] “Another is Avid chokes on everything that is not dnx. “
I’m finding ProRes works extremely well. In fact, I see no difference in performance at all. Are you finding differently? Or are you working on Windows?