Forum Replies Created

Page 28 of 282
  • Chris Harlan

    November 15, 2013 at 3:54 am in reply to: FCPX and analog video.

    [Bret Williams] “How else would you read ” I don’t think they have updated drivers for thunderbolt?”

    A driver for thunderbolt would be a thunderbolt driver. I thought it was quite a bizarre statement as well. “

    Actually, a number of drivers for Express cards had to be updated to function with Thunderbolt Express card readers because of incompatibilities with Thunderbolt. And, many were not updated, never will be, and will never be compatible. Some bus powered Firewire devices also need driver alterations to function in bus-powered mode under Tbolt’s more limited bus power, and, many will never be able to be bus powered on the first iteration of Tbolt. So, there are numerous driver issues related to TBolt that don’t involve “TBOLT DRIVERS.”

  • Chris Harlan

    November 15, 2013 at 3:37 am in reply to: FCPX and analog video.

    [Clint Wardlow] “I may have misstated due to my lack of working with Thunderbolt (my imac is the generation before Thunderbolt). It is my understanding that some older firewire devices do not work with the thunderbolt adapter (cameras, MIDI instruments, and such). Several of my musician friends bitterly complained about this. And as Gary said, given the age of my Sony HDV camera and the Canopus, I was afraid this might be the case.”

    No, you are right. And its a fair question. Ignore the ill-informed disdainful noise. Most of the driver issues that I’m aware of have been with drivers for Express cards that people were trying to use with Thunderbolt Express card adapters. The firewire issues that I’m aware of are power related, in that the Tbolt bus does not offer enough power to power a number of bus-powered firewire devices. If you operate the device with external power, this won’t be a problem.

  • Chris Harlan

    November 12, 2013 at 10:03 pm in reply to: Transcoding to ProRes 422 LT for Optimised Media

    [Adam White] “But I don’t understand why it’s such a big deal to ask for a simple transcode option to be added, and why some people seem so dead against it. LT works great. I understand not everyone will want to use it, but for those that it works well for, why deprive them of the option? “

    Its not a big deal. Its a very fair request to make. And, its certainly a fair and interesting point for discussion here on this board. Any rudeness or anger you are experiencing has nothing to do with you or your questions.

  • Chris Harlan

    November 12, 2013 at 7:58 pm in reply to: New Mac Pro vs. PC Workstation for Premiere

    [Lenny Greaster] “Just spreading the gospel… “

    No prob. I get it. I know its not impossible, and I’m tempted now and then, but the weight still falls a little heavier on the Mac side of the scale.

  • Chris Harlan

    November 12, 2013 at 6:28 pm in reply to: New Mac Pro vs. PC Workstation for Premiere

    [Luke Pearson] “If you want to stick with ProRes your only option is a Mac, a PC can decode but not encode unless Apple ever license the encode part to Adobe (they have done this with non competitors so very unlikely they’ll allow Adobe to license it.)

    This is the only thing stopping me from ditching Mac at my facility.

    I’m in the same boat. ProRes, both in and out, are a mandatory part of my chain, so I’m staying in Mac land, though I’ve been sorely tempted to go elsewhere.

  • Chris Harlan

    November 12, 2013 at 7:55 am in reply to: Transcoding to ProRes 422 LT for Optimised Media

    [Martin Curtis] “All I need is a small fortune. I’ve heard the best way to get that is to start with a large fortune, open a post-production house…

    Quote of the week!

  • Chris Harlan

    November 12, 2013 at 12:50 am in reply to: In the spirit of Détente…

    I’ve kept Rough Cut Lady in a corner of all of my desktops on all of my computers for the last 8 or 9 years. Just knowing that its there helps.

  • Chris Harlan

    November 12, 2013 at 12:47 am in reply to: In the spirit of Détente…

    [Steve Connor] “[Simon Ubsdell] “These days if the “rough cut” isn’t graded and mixed and polished to within an inch of its life and utterly indistinguishable from a finished product, your client will assume the project is irretrievably doomed.

    So true

    Ain’t that the truth!

  • Chris Harlan

    November 12, 2013 at 12:46 am in reply to: new MacPro in action, or trash can?

    That’s funny!

  • Chris Harlan

    November 10, 2013 at 7:32 pm in reply to: Honestly, who cares?

    [Nicholas Kleczewski] “Unfortunately the people doing most of the real work out there, just don’t have time for the lunacy, so we for the most part sit back and smile with slight repressed sadness and read the horror and the drivel most post about. “

    Seriously? I pray you get over your repressed sadness, however slight it might be.

Page 28 of 282

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy