Chris Harlan
Forum Replies Created
-
Wow. You guys are a trip. In another thread you seemed perplexed that I mentioned I was trying hard not to laugh at the name. You seem to have no problem. I agree with you; roles is a pretty condescending prosumerish name. But, hey, let’s try to ignore that and see if it does any good.
-
[Erik Lundberg] “And I find the Solo-buttons for Roles in the Timeline Index a very strong alternative to track soloing.”
That sounds interesting!
-
[Tom Wolsky] “Damn. They left out the egg roles again.”
LOL. Hey, I didn’t pick the name, and I’m working doubly hard not to say that it is stupid.
-
[Erik Lundberg] “we have to tick tracks (video and/or audio) on and off (and remember when and where), and in really large projects with several editors involved using very different levels of organizational skills this can really be ranging from a headache to a nightmare.”
Not in any world I work in. On multi-editor projects, tracks are assigned at the beginning of a project, and if people don’t stick to them they get seriously penalized.
-
[Andy Neil] “I’ll check it out this week sometime.”
Cool, love to hear about it. A good fix for that, and a way to export edls might just get me to re-up.
-
[David Roth Weiss] “Ms. Krause’s hostility”
I do believe that Kim is a fella, even though he made some reference once upon a time to how he looked in a dress.
-
Andy, I know this is off-topic, but when are you thinking of trying out “Roles?” I’d like to hear your feedback.
-
Bill, you are one crazy dude. It is pretty clear what Roles does–which is useful for me, btw–but why exactly do you need to jump down Simon’s throat when he is stating something that is pretty obvious? He wasn’t prognosticating, and he wasn’t doomsaying in anyway. He was talking about an issue, and yet you decided to turn your phasers to “belittle.” What’s with that?
-
[kim krause] “and you call yourself a journalist.” Rest of the “shame on you rant” cut.
Whoa there, Kim. This is a forum, not a news outlet. We discuss things and try to work them out. I’m not exactly sure why you are so hostile in your last post, but really it is no big deal. In fact, it is not even a little deal. My $.02, anyway.
-
[Erik Lundberg] “Either way this reassures me that there now are means to get things (with a little translational help) into this island to and from other vessels.”
If what I’ve seen is correct, we are going to need quite a bit more than translational help to get on and off this island. First off, you are going to need a pretty good pendulum to track the island’s movements–we have one here in LA–and you are going to need a submarine since the Island itself is blocked from view by some sort of time distortion barrier. Of course, a good storm might throw your ship there, and you CAN enter by plane, but it is a rough ride in.