Forum Replies Created

Page 2 of 282
  • Chris Harlan

    July 8, 2017 at 7:52 am in reply to: What would really make you excited …

    Yeah! What he said!!!

  • Chris Harlan

    July 6, 2017 at 4:54 am in reply to: Somewhat OT: Why Adobe Can’t be Stopped

    [Brian Seegmiller] “What are they afraid of by releasing those numbers?”

    Nothing?

  • Chris Harlan

    June 21, 2017 at 7:41 pm in reply to: BrickSculpting and Classical Conditioning.

    Just for the record–I have never, ever even remotely thought: Hey! That Shawn, he has a hard time grasping analogies. I have found, over the years, that have superior skills in both producing and understanding analogies. You are, in fact, damn good at it.

    As for Kong-Fu–I believe those are the set of teachings and philosophies that accompany the quest for the acquisition of a 12th level Donkey Kong belt. I could be wrong.

  • Chris Harlan

    June 15, 2017 at 12:43 am in reply to: Bricklayers and Sculptors

    This is what’s causing all this fuss and bent feelings. Heavens to Betsy. Yeah, Simon. I mostly agree with you, though I do believe there is a continuum be tween the two–at least with what I mostly do.

  • Chris Harlan

    June 13, 2017 at 11:15 pm in reply to: Why is the Premiere Pro titling tool so horrible?

    [andy patterson] “[Chris Harlan] “[Robin S. Kurz] “[andy patterson] “How well does Motion handle the bleed and slug area for printing?”

    Wow. Rarely seen anyone try THAT hard. ????

    He was speaking ironically. I think that was pretty obvious. Maybe not. ????”

    It was obvious to me and that is why I did not respond to this comment. I am surprised you did.

    ROTFL I have no idea what you are talking about.

  • Chris Harlan

    June 13, 2017 at 9:51 am in reply to: Why is the Premiere Pro titling tool so horrible?

    [Robin S. Kurz] “[andy patterson] “How well does Motion handle the bleed and slug area for printing?”

    Wow. Rarely seen anyone try THAT hard. ????

    He was speaking ironically. I think that was pretty obvious. Maybe not. ????

  • Chris Harlan

    April 26, 2017 at 5:49 pm in reply to: OT Resolve 14

    I was putting it off too. It’s much more nimble now. I got a pretty full demo on the NAB floor, and the sluggishness problems seem to be gone. It was running well on an iMac.

  • Chris Harlan

    April 26, 2017 at 7:32 am in reply to: OT Resolve 14

    I got a half an hour demo with it at NAB. Its a magnificent piece of software. I still prefer Premiere as an NLE, but it has some real cool stuff. AND, it no longer slogs–it now runs well on lesser systems. I’ll drop 3 hundred on it. Its a really nice tool.

  • Chris Harlan

    April 15, 2017 at 7:13 am in reply to: The iMac “Pro” rumor looks interesting

    [Robin S. Kurz] “[Oliver Peters] “I’m sure you would dispute any example I presented”

    Bit of a cop-out, don’t you think? If they are legitimate points, how could I?

    You generally find a way.

  • Chris Harlan

    April 13, 2017 at 8:42 pm in reply to: The iMac “Pro” rumor looks interesting

    [Oliver Peters] “There are plenty of things that I find to be faster in Premiere for me and most of the other editors I work together with. I’m sure you would dispute any example I presented, so why bother. Likewise, I can also point to specifics where X is faster. It’s a rabbit hole argument that’s been debated extensively since this forum was opened. So, as I said, I answered the question you asked.”

    Indeed!

Page 2 of 282

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy