Forum Replies Created

Page 191 of 282
  • Chris Harlan

    March 29, 2012 at 4:02 am in reply to: FCPX from an Editor who used it on Iditarod 2012

    [tony west] “They want to cover themselves and that’s cool but no matter how big their show is, and I don’t know many people bigger than Oprah, at the end of the day they are leaving that truck with 4 tracks of audio.”

    That might be the case for your truck, but on the large unscripted stuff I’ve worked on, there are definitely more than four audio/video ISOs available–usually one for each lav, a couple of booms, and a static room mic. Of course that’s in a studio, so its easier to manage.

  • Chris Harlan

    March 29, 2012 at 3:52 am in reply to: New Mac Pro or EOL coming soon?

    [Jeremy Garchow] “Couldn’t pull that windows trigger quite yet, eh? 😉

    Hey, I used to think Windows was great, and I have no problem going back that way. Its the ProRes thing, right now. My large clients have it as their delivery spec, though some of them are actively investigating others. So, IMX, DNx–OS X has it covered, but it also has ProRes covered, which Windows does not. And FCS3 still has a lot of life in it here in LA. If a Mac Pro does emerge, I will probably stay OS X–at least for a few more years.

    [Jeremy Garchow] “those new quad core MBPs are very nice”

    The Thunderbolt is pretty spiffy. And, that’s on the small RAIDS.

  • Chris Harlan

    March 29, 2012 at 1:40 am in reply to: Media Management – Beating a dead horse?

    [Tangier Clarke] “i guess I better get on board, open the wallet and accept (knowingly) that this is the way everything is moving. Though media management a la FCP 7 is something I think is valuable even in the age of cheaper endless storage.”

    I agree with you. I’ve gotten a lot of use with FCP 7.s media manager. It is a ver easy way for me to back up projects.

  • Chris Harlan

    March 29, 2012 at 12:44 am in reply to: FCPX from an Editor who used it on Iditarod 2012

    [Michael Gissing] “Sorry Herb but my inner pedant is being invoked. None of those NLE’s have written anything so hard to compare to Steinbeck, but Steenbeck is another matter.:)

    That’s pretty funny. I’m reading/listening to “East of Eden” right now, and if it comes down to a choice between FCP X being in the world and “East of Eden” being in the world, I’ll take “East of Eden.” Magnificent book! Much more too it than the movie.

  • Chris Harlan

    March 29, 2012 at 12:22 am in reply to: FCPX from an Editor who used it on Iditarod 2012

    [Andrew Kimery] “Maybe I’m missing something, but I don’t see how uploading files for client approval or keeping files online so you don’t have to batch capture from tape are workflows exclusive to FCPX.”

    I’ve been doing that for years, as well. I don’t get the hullabaloo, either.

  • Chris Harlan

    March 29, 2012 at 12:17 am in reply to: New Mac Pro or EOL coming soon?

    [Steve Connor] “UK store still showing 3 days for 8 Core Mac Pros as are a few more countries that had stock last week.

    US and Canadian stores still have them though, I’m still hoping for an announcement either way soon!

    I finally gave up waiting and went with a new 17″ and TBolt drives. I am enjoying the throughput, but who knows? Might be my last Mac. I’ll take another look in the fall, but right now my old 8 Core is good enough, and my 17″ is almost as good. Hopefully, by Fall, I’ll have some sense of to what degree the Mac platform remains.

  • Chris Harlan

    March 29, 2012 at 12:08 am in reply to: My Demagnetized FCPX with Tracks

    [David Lawrence] “[Andrew Kimery] “I disagree to a degree. I think it has ‘Steve Jobs think’, not group think, written all over it. I think Steve had a vision of how editing should be and that’s the direction FCPX went in. I’ve read accounts from people that gave notes nearly a year before FCPX was launched and they were being ignored.”

    I think you’re exactly right about Steve Jobs. I would argue he was the leader of the group. 😉

    It definitely has that one button mouse feel.

  • Chris Harlan

    March 29, 2012 at 12:03 am in reply to: FCPX users – stand up and be counted!

    [Simon Ubsdell] “[Steve Connor] “I’m interested to know how many people on here are actually using FCPX for work in some way at the moment”

    Still can’t risk it and increasingly getting beyond the point where I actually care what happens to it because not nearly enough has happened to make it any more plausible as an option.

    So that I don’t skew Steve’s count, I’ll just “me too” what Simon has to say here.

  • I’d like to see enough competition on 4K monitors to drive the prices down a bit.

  • [T. Payton] “Indeed I should have known better. I re-read my post and realized that it indeed sounded like I said if someone didn’t embrace FCP X they were not accepting technology and therefore a Luddite.”

    Fair enough.

    [T. Payton] “I admit my ignorance also. Here in the Western United States “Luddite” is not part of the vocabulary, and I had not heard the term until I read of it recently.

    In this part of the Western United States–at least at the Universities I’ve attended and in a number of the technical places I have worked–its a fairly common slur for the technically dismissive or disinclined. It gets a lot more usage than, say, flat-earther or troglodyte. I’m surprised that you haven’t come across it before.

Page 191 of 282

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy