Forum Replies Created

Page 2 of 2
  • Bullpup

    September 15, 2005 at 7:19 pm in reply to: Any advice on ‘Weather’ plug-ins and effects?

    Thanks, I’ll check into it

  • Bullpup

    September 9, 2005 at 10:46 pm in reply to: Other FCP forums?

    Thanks, does apple host any good forums?

  • Bullpup

    May 5, 2005 at 10:43 pm in reply to: Capturing footage from DVCAM

    I have several DV cameras including a DSR-500 and none of them record at an EP or SP mode. There is DV and DVCAM, the later of which is supposed to record and play at a FASTER speed than DV, which is is odd to me because both formats are supposed to be 25mbs. But the deck you use will know if the tape was recorded in DV or DVCAM speed and will play them at the correct speed, outputting virtually the same signal to your computer, regardless.

  • Bullpup

    May 5, 2005 at 2:59 pm in reply to: Capturing footage from DVCAM

    The DSR-500 shares the same basic specs as the newer DSR-570.

  • Bullpup

    April 22, 2005 at 2:25 pm in reply to: Lacie caught on fire

    Ice Pack. My Lacie heats up pretty quick but as long as I have an ice pack on top of it, it behaves itself.

  • Bullpup

    April 20, 2005 at 8:35 pm in reply to: New Panasonic P2 website

    I’ve got one. Just made it out of PVC and a lense hood from a dvx100.

  • Bullpup

    April 11, 2005 at 11:27 pm in reply to: What camera must be…

    DAMN interesting! Lots of questions but I’d like to see how this camera unfolds in the next few months. Great price it really does what they say!

  • Bullpup

    April 6, 2005 at 10:43 pm in reply to: HDX-200 lens good or just functional.

    OK, back to the topic…

    If Panasonic made this product “too good”, they would be cannibalizing their own Vericam and 900SDX. They have to leave out options that will direct professionals, who know enough about the medium, to their higher end units or there would be no reason to purchase them. EXPECT this camera to have a lens that is very sub-par to discriminating “cinematographers”. Think about it… it’s pretty shocking that in a few months (maybe) you will be able to purchase a camcorder that records at 100mbs for under 10gs… that’s incredible, you can’t even get a stand alone 100mbs VTR for twice that! If you added up all the features on this camera ‘on paper’, you’d come up with a product that should sell for 90K, keeping in mind that a real HD lens costs 30K +. As someone who’s been involved with digital cinema since its roots, my opinion of this camera is that it is an attempt to get low budget filmmakers to embrace P2 storage.

  • Bullpup

    April 6, 2005 at 3:31 pm in reply to: Dead Pixel Fix?

    If you’re wanting to fix the problem in your camera, look into something called Image Mapping. It will kick on the dead pixels and costs about $1200.00, as opposed to paying Sony $6000.00 for a new CCD block, and another $2000.00 for them to install it and ship it back to you.

Page 2 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy