Forum Replies Created

Page 20 of 37
  • Bouke Vahl

    October 19, 2018 at 8:26 am in reply to: What do you think of these lens zooms?

    Why can’t people just stop replying to this guy.
    He does not take advice, he has done nothing significant nor does he tries to do anything himself, claims to have done filmschool but has less knowledge than a teenager after an afternoon of googling but he keeps asking for attention and gives nothing back.

    It’s pure waste of time and bandwith. (And no, I’m not stating that as an opinion.)

    Bouke
    http://www.videotoolshed.com

  • Bouke Vahl

    October 9, 2018 at 11:05 am in reply to: Revamped Forums

    [Tim Wilson] ” If something inappropriate happens in a private message on a Creative COW server, Creative COW is legally responsible for the content.”

    I can’t believe this. An ISP (and in some sense CC is alike) is not fully responsible for the content. In fact, if my ISP spies on my mails, it would be the same as the mailman opening my letters. But, granted, US laws are strange and a very good reason not to go to the US anymore, but all this is becoming highly political and forbidden banned contagious OT ☺
    (Besides I’m no lawyer nor want to become one. But I totally understand not hiring one, just stay on the safe side)

    [Tim Wilson] “, because I’m right.”

    Don’t steal my lines!

    Bouke
    http://www.videotoolshed.com

  • Bouke Vahl

    October 9, 2018 at 9:13 am in reply to: Revamped Forums

    I totally disagree with Tim about being forced to monitor private messages, but that is beside the point.

    What I totally do agree on is NOT implementing such a service.
    I would immediately opt out of direct messaging on this forum. Not cause of the private issues, but I hate to answer the same question again, and it is nice to build a database where people can find answers.
    (And yes, I also had private questions that, If I respond, send back to the forum instantly.)

    And yes, people who need me outside the forum know where to find me, and that works out just fine.

    Bouke
    http://www.videotoolshed.com

  • [Eric Toline] “Most likely it’s either 16 or 24bit @ 48frames per second.”

    The sample rate and bitdepth have nothing to do with frame rate. 48 fps is a frame rate for special fx slomo shots for movies in the 35 mm era, so why bring it up? It makes no sense at all.

    Frame rate in BWF is just a piece of metadata to tell other software how to do the calculation between SAM (samples after midnight, as time is desribred in a BWF file)
    The actual value is of no meaning at all if it is not honoured by the player.

    In case of setting the timestamp to 00:00:00:00, the value of the SAM wil be 0, as zero samples have passed since midnight.
    And that will be the case in all frame rates.
    Setting the value will only aid the time display in the player software, and only if there is a drop frame TC display.

    Bouke
    http://www.videotoolshed.com

  • ffmpeg will do it fast and for free.

    Bouke
    http://www.videotoolshed.com

  • Bouke Vahl

    September 14, 2018 at 6:25 am in reply to: Using Timecode Audio Data to sync in Premier Pro

    Hi Ricky,
    Please, do tell me what the Tentacle software does that mine does not.
    (Really, last time I’ve looked it had close to no options, and was hardware locked to a physical product.)

    Bouke
    http://www.videotoolshed.com

  • Bouke Vahl

    September 14, 2018 at 6:22 am in reply to: Working with. srt file and caption tool

    Captions are not subtitles. It is just metadata in the file containing text, color and position.
    SRT does NOT hold postition and color in most instances. (Although it ‘is’ sorta kinda possible.)

    IOW, the end user set creates the captions on the fly, normally ugly with a solid box behind it. Nothing you can do about that.

    (It’s 40 year old technology made for low bandwidth analogue addition to existing tv broadcast)

    If you want total control and burn in, have a look at subbits from my site.
    (It has a nice premiere workflow, see here:)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcKOZAkhRRM&t=2s

    Bouke
    http://www.videotoolshed.com

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • There is motion blur on the controls but not on the skateboard.
    Turn it on. I don’t care if the subject needs to be sharp, it’s either one or the other.
    Pick your poison.

    Bouke
    http://www.videotoolshed.com

  • Bouke Vahl

    September 7, 2018 at 4:06 am in reply to: 60i footage to 30p output?

    [Sam Lee] “Is 60i is another way to express it as 59.94 fields (29.97 frames * 2 fields = 59.94 fields, established back in ’53 by NTSC), which is essentially 29.97 interlaced frames for US broadcast?”

    Yes, and as you agree, it is a very bad / stupid way of describing normal speed interlaced.

    [Sam Lee] ” 60p is actually recording at 59.94 fps frequency”

    Not always. 60p (as well as 30p) actually exists. (Mostly in consumer / action cams.)
    So, sometimes it’s 60 or 30, sometimes it’s 59.94/29.97.
    (And yes, that sucks too if it’s not always the correct number.)

    [Sam Lee] “60i recorded clip after de-interlacing (using hi-quality method) is effectively equivalent to 29.97p.”

    I though we just established that 60i DOES NOT exist?
    For the 0.1 % speed difference, a speed change (if needed) is very well acceptable, just pitch shift the sound as well to stay sync.

    [Sam Lee] “Most broadcasters are OK with interlaced video.”
    I would say ALL broadcasters, except Netflix and other online platforms.

    [Sam Lee] ” If it’s mixed with progressive scan, then deinterlace it to match.”

    Why? If the mix looks good, it is good. (Especially motion graphics can be interlaced in a progressive sequence.)

    Bouke
    http://www.videotoolshed.com

  • Bouke Vahl

    August 29, 2018 at 7:27 am in reply to: 60i footage to 30p output?

    If they are a broadcaster they use 29.97 i
    note, 60 i DOES NOT EXIST. It’s 60 p, or 59.94 p.

    Do NOT go to 30p. Go to 29.97 i.

    Not sure about Premiere, but if you use AE, and set interpret footage correct, and put the footage in a 29.97 i comp, you should be fine. (It will time stretch, not sure about the sound. That should be (unnoticable) pitch shifted. Check for sync on long takes. Short (under a minute) should never be an issue.

    Bouke
    http://www.videotoolshed.com

Page 20 of 37

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy